Literature DB >> 9373931

Production of succinate from glucose, cellobiose, and various cellulosic materials by the ruminal anaerobic bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens.

R R Gokarn1, M A Eiteman, S A Martin, K E Eriksson.   

Abstract

The production of organic acids by two anaerobic ruminal bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 and Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1, was compared with glucose, cellobiose, microcrystalline cellulose, Walseth cellulose (acid swollen cellulose), pulped paper, and steam-exploded yellow poplar as substrates. The major end product produced by F. succinogenes from each of these substrates was succinate (69.5-83%), the principal secondary product was acetate (16-30.5%). Maximum succinate productivity ranged from 14.1 mg/L.h for steam-exploded yellow Poplar to 59.7 mg/L.h for pulped paper. For R. flavefaciens, the major end product from cellobiose, microcrystalline cellulose, and acid-swollen Walseth cellulose was acetate (39-46%), pulped paper and steam-exploded yellow poplar yielded succinate (42-54%) as the major product. Maximum succinate productivity by R. flavefaciens ranged from 9.21 mg/L.h for cellobiose to 43.1 mg/L.h for pulped paper. In general, much less succinate was produced at a lower maximum productivity by R. flavefaciens than by F. succinogenes under similar fermentation conditions. The maximum succinate productivities by these two organisms are comparable to the previously reported value of 59 mg/L.h for Anderobiospirillum succiniciproducens grown on glucose and corn steep liquor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373931     DOI: 10.1007/bf02785981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  5 in total

1.  Systematic Analysis of Escherichia coli Isolates from Sheep and Cattle Suggests Adaption to the Rumen Niche.

Authors:  Jian Pang; Zhanying Liu; Qiancheng Zhang; Xuemei Lu; Qingsheng Qi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse.

Authors:  Heather R Mattila; Daniela Rios; Victoria E Walker-Sperling; Guus Roeselers; Irene L G Newton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Sedimentary Nitrogen and Sulfur Reduction Functional-Couplings Interplay With the Microbial Community of Anthropogenic Shrimp Culture Pond Ecosystem.

Authors:  Renjun Zhou; Dongwei Hou; Shenzheng Zeng; Dongdong Wei; Lingfei Yu; Shicheng Bao; Shaoping Weng; Jianguo He; Zhijian Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  A global analysis of gene expression in Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 grown on cellulose and soluble sugars at different growth rates.

Authors:  Anthony P Neumann; Paul J Weimer; Garret Suen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Supplementation of branched-chain amino acids decreases fat accumulation in the liver through intestinal microbiota-mediated production of acetic acid.

Authors:  Masao Iwao; Koro Gotoh; Mie Arakawa; Mizuki Endo; Koichi Honda; Masataka Seike; Kazunari Murakami; Hirotaka Shibata
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.