Literature DB >> 937381

How prevalence of hypertension varies as diagnostic criteria change.

M H Alderman, K Yano.   

Abstract

In a effort to determine what impact diagnostic criteria might have in defining the magnitude of the "hypertensive" population, various definitions of high blood pressure were applied to the same population. At the initial encounter, 23.3 per cent of the subjects had blood pressures greater than or equal to 160/95 mm Hg, but less than half of these sustained that level on two subsequent occasions over the next three weeks. When an initial diastolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 105 mm Hg was used to define hypertension, prevalence fell by more than two thirds (23.3 to 7.2 per cent). These results clearly demonstrate that even a very simple modification of diagnostic criteria can markedly alter the prevalence of "hypertension."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 937381     DOI: 10.1097/00000441-197605000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Sci        ISSN: 0002-9629            Impact factor:   2.378


  5 in total

1.  Screening for hypertension: a rational approach.

Authors:  R F Gillum; W B Stason; M C Weinstein
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1978

2.  Normal blood pressure in offspring of persons with essential hypertension.

Authors:  B S Kaplan; H Fox; E Seidman; K N Drummond
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1978-06-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Nontraditional problems of antihypertensive management.

Authors:  P Rudd; K I Marton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1979-09

4.  The dynamics of blood pressure in populations and hypertensive cohorts.

Authors:  G B Ambrosio; J E Dowd; T Strasser; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 5.  The Evolution of Fibromyalgia, Its Concepts, and Criteria.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Johannes J Rasker
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.