Literature DB >> 9373694

Simulated cataract does not reduce the benefit of RSVP.

E M Fine1, E Peli, A Reeves.   

Abstract

Normally sighted younger and older (mean age 71 years) observers read sentences and random lists of words from a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) display and a scroll display using their normal vision and through two levels of cataract simulators. Unlike patients with central field loss (CFL), there was no decrease in the benefit of RSVP with reduced vision due to the cataract simulators. However, the usefulness of sentence-level context was reduced as visual acuity was reduced. In addition, older readers did not benefit as much from RSVP as younger readers, and many in the older group were unable to read using the more severe cataract simulators from either display format. From these data we conclude that the benefits of RSVP are not reduced with reduced acuity and contrast sensitivity, and that there are age-related changes in reading rates from dynamic text displays not related to acuity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373694     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00051-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Effects of yellow filters on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and reading under conditions of forward light scatter.

Authors:  Frank Eperjesi; Lillian Evangelica Agelis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing "Speed Limits" on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Donatella Spinelli; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does the mean adequately represent reading performance? Evidence from a cross-linguistic study.

Authors:  Chiara V Marinelli; Joanna K Horne; Sarah P McGeown; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.