Literature DB >> 9373678

Quantitative perimetry under binocular viewing conditions in microstrabismus.

M V Joosse1, H J Simonsz, H M van Minderhout, P T de Jong, B Noordzij, P G Mulder.   

Abstract

In order to elucidate the type, size and depth of suppression scotomata in microstrabismus and small angle convergent strabismus, we performed binocular static perimetry in 14 subjects with strabismus and four normal observers. The strabismic cases had an objective angle of convergent squint between 1 and 8 deg, visual acuity between 0.1 and 1.25, and limited stereopsis. During testing the subjects fused pictures on two Friedmann visual field analyzers. Right and left eyes were studied separately under both monocular and binocular viewing conditions. In five strabismics a suppression scotoma was found in the squinting eye, with a diameter of 5-30 deg and a depth ranging from 4 to 14 dB. No suppression scotomata could be detected in the nine other subjects nor in the four normal observers. In conclusion, only 36% of subjects with strabismus were found to have a suppression scotoma. These scotomata were centered around the fixation point of the squinting eye, in some cases also encompassing the foveal area, and varying in depth and size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373678     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Metabolic mapping of suppression scotomas in striate cortex of macaques with experimental strabismus.

Authors:  J C Horton; D R Hocking; D L Adams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias.

Authors:  D-S Yang; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual evoked potentials during suppression in exotropic and esotropic strabismics: strabismic suppression objectified.

Authors:  Maurits V Joosse; Danielle L Esme; Rob J Schimsheimer; Sandra A M Verspeek; Marleen H L Vermeulen; Ellen M van Minderhout
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of oculomotor abnormalities in the infantile strabismus syndrome.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Adam Pallus; Jérome Fleuriet; Michael J Mustari; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial patterns of fixation-switch behavior in strabismic monkeys.

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Stephanie K LeSage; Anand C Joshi; Vallabh E Das
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparison of three models of saccade disconjugacy in strabismus.

Authors:  Mark M G Walton; Michael J Mustari
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Monocular and binocular reading performance in children with microstrabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  E Stifter; G Burggasser; E Hirmann; A Thaler; W Radner
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  A limited role for suppression in the central field of individuals with strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Binocular summation and other forms of non-dominant eye contribution in individuals with strabismic amblyopia during habitual viewing.

Authors:  Brendan T Barrett; Gurvinder K Panesar; Andrew J Scally; Ian E Pacey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interocular ND filter suppression: Eccentricity and luminance polarity effects.

Authors:  Akash S Chima; Monika A Formankiewicz; Sarah J Waugh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.