Literature DB >> 9373013

The second visual area in the marmoset monkey: visuotopic organisation, magnification factors, architectonical boundaries, and modularity.

M G Rosa1, K A Fritsches, G N Elston.   

Abstract

The organisation of the second visual area (V2) in marmoset monkeys was studied by means of extracellular recordings of responses to visual stimulation and examination of myelin- and cytochrome oxidase-stained sections. Area V2 forms a continuous cortical belt of variable width (1-2 mm adjacent to the foveal representation of V1, and 3-3.5 mm near the midline and on the tentorial surface) bordering V1 on the lateral, dorsal, medial, and tentorial surfaces of the occipital lobe. The total surface area of V2 is approximately 100 mm2, or about 50% of the surface area of V1 in the same individuals. In each hemisphere, the receptive fields of V2 neurones cover the entire contralateral visual hemifield, forming an ordered visuotopic representation. As in other simians, the dorsal and ventral halves of V2 represent the lower and upper contralateral quadrants, respectively, with little invasion of the ipsilateral hemifield. The representation of the vertical meridian forms the caudal border of V2, with V1, whereas a field discontinuity approximately coincident with the horizontal meridian forms the rostral border of V2, with other visually responsive areas. The bridge of cortex connecting dorsal and ventral V2 contains neurones with receptive fields centred within 1 degree of the centre of the fovea. The visuotopy, size, shape and location of V2 show little variation among individuals. Analysis of cortical magnification factor (CMF) revealed that the V2 map of the visual field is highly anisotropic: for any given eccentricity, the CMF is approximately twice as large in the dimension parallel to the V1/V2 border as it is perpendicular to this border. Moreover, comparison of V2 and V1 in the same individuals demonstrated that the representation of the central visual field is emphasised in V2, relative to V1. Approximately half of the surface area of V2 is dedicated to the representation of the central 5 degrees of the visual field. Calculations based on the CMF, receptive field scatter, and receptive field size revealed that the point-image size measured parallel to the V1/V2 border (2-3 mm) equals the width of a full cycle of cytochrome oxidase stripes in V2, suggesting a close correspondence between physiological and anatomical estimates of the dimensions of modular components in this area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373013     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19971103)387:4<547::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  27 in total

1.  Connectional and architectonic evidence for dorsal and ventral V3, and dorsomedial area in marmoset monkeys.

Authors:  D C Lyon; J H Kaas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Extraclassical receptive field properties of parvocellular, magnocellular, and koniocellular cells in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Andrew J R White; Paul R Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  High-resolution mapping of anatomical connections in marmoset extrastriate cortex reveals a complete representation of the visual field bordering dorsal V2.

Authors:  Janelle Jeffs; Frederick Federer; Jennifer M Ichida; Alessandra Angelucci
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Single-unit responses to kinetic stimuli in New World monkey area V2: physiological characteristics of cue-invariant neurones.

Authors:  L L Lui; J A Bourne; M G P Rosa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Brain maps, great and small: lessons from comparative studies of primate visual cortical organization.

Authors:  Marcello G P Rosa; Rowan Tweedale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Anatomical evidence for classical and extra-classical receptive field completion across the discontinuous horizontal meridian representation of primate area V2.

Authors:  Janelle Jeffs; Jennifer M Ichida; Frederick Federer; Alessandra Angelucci
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Topographic Organization of the 'Third-Tier' Dorsomedial Visual Cortex in the Macaque.

Authors:  Kostas Hadjidimitrakis; Sophia Bakola; Tristan A Chaplin; Hsin-Hao Yu; Omar Alanazi; Jonathan M Chan; Katrina H Worthy; Marcello G P Rosa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Four projection streams from primate V1 to the cytochrome oxidase stripes of V2.

Authors:  Frederick Federer; Jennifer M Ichida; Janelle Jeffs; Ingo Schiessl; Niall McLoughlin; Alessandra Angelucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Modeling magnification and anisotropy in the primate foveal confluence.

Authors:  Mark M Schira; Christopher W Tyler; Branka Spehar; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Contrast adaptation contributes to contrast-invariance of orientation tuning of primate V1 cells.

Authors:  Lionel G Nowak; Pascal Barone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.