Literature DB >> 9372760

Overview: maintaining outcomes for total hip arthroplasty. The past, present, and future.

M A Ritter1, M J Albohm.   

Abstract

Developing and maintaining outcomes for total hip arthroplasty, resulting in meaningful and usable data, presents many challenges for today's clinician. Outcomes data collected must show patients' clinical, functional, and overall quality of life status. Data also must be appropriate to illustrate efficiency, effectiveness, and value of medical interventions provided to payers. Previous and current measures of assessing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty are presented, evaluated, and discussed. Recommended standards for the future, including the identification of specific data needed such as demographics, Short Form-36, patient satisfaction, length of stay, infection rate, return to surgery, and revision rates are introduced, leading to an outcomes based suggested standard of care for total hip arthroplasty with application to patients, providers, and payers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; J M Norquist; C Jenkinson; B C Reeves; R W Morris; D W Murray; P J Gregg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  An informatics blueprint for healthcare quality information systems.

Authors:  Joyce C Niland; Layla Rouse; Douglas C Stahl
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The Clinical Outcomes Assessment Toolkit: a framework to support automated clinical records-based outcomes assessment and performance measurement research.

Authors:  Leonard W D'Avolio; Alex A T Bui
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Hip arthrosis and surgical intervention: what and when?

Authors:  Massimo Innocenti; Lorenzo Nistri; Marco Biondi; Armando Del Prete; Marco Giorgini; Armando Macera; Stefano Soderi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-01

5.  Modular cementless cup for total hip arthroplasty: results at 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alessandro Bistolfi; Giuseppe Massazza; Federica Rosso; Stefano Ventura; Francesco Lagalla; Maurizio Crova
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-01-06

6.  Pseudotumor recurrence in a post-revision total hip arthroplasty with stem neck modularity: A case report.

Authors:  Bhumit R Desai; Gonzalo E Sumarriva; George F Chimento
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-18

7.  [Total hip arthroplasty in Austria. Results of a nationwide survey based on a questionnaire].

Authors:  W Brodner; B Raffelsberger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  The Biological Metallic versus Metallic Solution in Treating Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Outcome Assessment.

Authors:  Serafino Carta; Mattia Fortina; Alberto Riva; Luigi Meccariello; Enrico Manzi; Antonio Di Giovanni; Paolo Ferrata
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2016-11-20

9.  The Cost of Routine Follow-Up in Total Joint Arthroplasty and the Influence of These Visits on Treatment Plans.

Authors:  Thomas J Hendricks; Alexander C M Chong; Robert P Cusick
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2018-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.