Literature DB >> 9372492

Body composition by x-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance in female runners.

C Pichard1, U G Kyle, G Gremion, M Gerbase, D O Slosman.   

Abstract

Body composition interests athletes since athletic performance is influenced by and dependent on the proportion and total amount of fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass. The use of bioelectrical impedance (BIA) has increased recently since portable instruments make the measurements easy to execute and relatively inexpensive. The purpose of this study was to test the degree of relationship between FFM and fat mass calculated in elite female runners with 12 different BIA formulas reported in the literature and measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The present study shows that body composition by BIA is valid in female runners. Prediction equations used to calculate FFM and fat mass must be appropriate for this population subgroup and validated against other methods, such as DXA and hydrodensitometry. Those formulas that performed well in the controls gave poor results in the female runner and vice versa. The below average fat mass noted in female runners suggests that prediction equations for untrained women with average fat mass are inappropriate. The formula by RJL Systems-2 for women: FFM = 5.091 + 0.6483.height2/resistance + 0.1996.weight gave best predictions of FFM in female runners. Further research is necessary to validate BIA prediction formulas in other athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372492     DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199711000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  10 in total

1.  Circadian rhythm of some parameters of body composition in the elderly investigated by means of bioelectrical impedance analysis.

Authors:  P Cugini; A Salandri; V Celli; R Leonetti Luparini; R De Rosa; V Marigliano
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Daily hunger sensation and body compartments: II. Their relationships in obese patients.

Authors:  P Cugini; A Salandri; M Cilli; P Ceccotti; A Di Marzo; A Rodio; S Fontana; A M Pellegrino; G P De Francesco; S Coda; F De Vito; L Colosi; C M Petrangeli; C Giovannini
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  A comparison of three bioelectrical impedance analyses for predicting lean body mass in a population with a large difference in muscularity.

Authors:  Noriko Ishiguro; Hiroaki Kanehisa; Masae Miyatani; Yoshihisa Masuo; Tetsuo Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Assessment of analytical methods used to measure changes in body composition in the elderly and recommendations for their use in phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  M S Lustgarten; R A Fielding
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Bioelectrical impedance analysis versus reference methods in the assessment of body composition in athletes.

Authors:  Francesco Campa; Luis Alberto Gobbo; Silvia Stagi; Leticia Trindade Cyrino; Stefania Toselli; Elisabetta Marini; Giuseppe Coratella
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Comparison of Techniques for Tracking Body Composition Changes across a Season in College Women Basketball Players.

Authors:  Ashley Ploudre; Jana L Arabas; Liz Jorn; Jerry L Mayhew
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

7.  Athlete or Non-athlete? This Is the Question in Body Composition.

Authors:  Francesco Campa; Giuseppe Coratella
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Ulla Svantesson; Martina Zander; Sofia Klingberg; Frode Slinde
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2008-01-22

9.  The reproducibility and validity verification for body composition measuring devices using bioelectrical impedance analysis in Korean adults.

Authors:  Seung-Won Yang; Tai-Hyung Kim; Hyun-Min Choi
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 10.  Come Back Skinfolds, All Is Forgiven: A Narrative Review of the Efficacy of Common Body Composition Methods in Applied Sports Practice.

Authors:  Andreas M Kasper; Carl Langan-Evans; James F Hudson; Thomas E Brownlee; Liam D Harper; Robert J Naughton; James P Morton; Graeme L Close
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.717

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.