Literature DB >> 9369840

Third-generation oral contraceptive and deep venous thrombosis: from epidemiologic controversy to new insight in coagulation.

J P Vandenbroucke1, F M Helmerhorst, K W Bloemenkamp, F R Rosendaal.   

Abstract

Four epidemiologic studies showed a twofold increase in risk of deep venous thrombosis with the use of oral contraceptives containing third-generation progestins, relative to second-generation products. These findings have been strongly debated ever since, and new studies have been added. In the current article we examine whether the findings can be explained by potential biases or other shortcomings of the epidemiologic studies. We conclude that complete certainty cannot exist but that the most rational conclusion from the epidemiologic findings and their discussion is that an increased risk of deep venous thrombosis with third-generation contraceptives is likely, especially in first-time and young users. The controversy has recently led to new insights in coagulation: Women who use third-generation contraceptives acquire a resistance to the blood's own anticoagulation system, similar to the activated protein C resistance that is seen in persons who carry the factor V Leiden mutation but different from that in women using second-generation contraceptives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Biology; Blood Coagulation Effects; Contraception; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods; Diseases; Embolism; Epidemiologic Methods; Error Sources; Family Planning; Hematological Effects; Hemic System; Literature Review; Measurement; Oral Contraceptives; Oral Contraceptives, Low-dose; Physiology; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis; Vascular Diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9369840     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70289-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

1.  Third generation oral contraceptives and risk of venous thrombosis: meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Kemmeren; A Algra; D E Grobbee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-21

Review 2.  Is the large simple trial design used for comparative, post-approval safety research? A review of a clinical trials registry and the published literature.

Authors:  Robert F Reynolds; Joanna A Lem; Nicolle M Gatto; Sybil M Eng
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms.

Authors:  I F Godsland; U Winkler; O Lidegaard; D Crook
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Safety of a new oral contraceptive containing drospirenone.

Authors:  Lothar A J Heinemann; Jürgen Dinger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  A practical guide to prescribing hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  K A McKinney; W Thompson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  International Active Surveillance Study of Women Taking Oral Contraceptives (INAS-OC Study).

Authors:  Juergen C Dinger; Kristina Bardenheuer; Anita Assmann
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  The venous thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives, effects of oestrogen dose and progestogen type: results of the MEGA case-control study.

Authors:  A van Hylckama Vlieg; F M Helmerhorst; J P Vandenbroucke; C J M Doggen; F R Rosendaal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-13

Review 8.  Different combined oral contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bernardine H Stegeman; Marcos de Bastos; Frits R Rosendaal; A van Hylckama Vlieg; Frans M Helmerhorst; Theo Stijnen; Olaf M Dekkers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-09-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.