Literature DB >> 9368868

Adverse effects of screening for gestational diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Toronto, Canada.

D Kerbel1, R Glazier, S Holzapfel, M Yeung, S Lofsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adverse effects associated with a false positive 50 g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
SETTING: Consecutive women attending a prenatal registration clinic at a large community hospital in suburban Toronto, Canada.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study of women between 12 and 24 weeks' gestation with no previous history of diabetes mellitus or GDM. Main outcome measures included anxiety (Spielberger's State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), depression (Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), perceived maternal health, and concern about health of the newborn.
RESULTS: Among 2564 eligible subjects, there were 897 subjects with complete data at enrollment and at 32 weeks' gestation, including 88 who had false positive glucose challenge test results. At 32 weeks, only 20% (95% confidence limits 11%, 28%) of women with false positive glucose challenge test results rated their health as excellent, compared with 38% (35%, 42%) of those having negative results and those not tested (P = 0.001). These results were sustained at 36 weeks. There was no association between glucose challenge test result and the change in anxiety (P = 0.57), depression (P = 0.09) or concern about health of the newborn (P = 0.91) between baseline and 32 weeks' gestation, nor were these associations found at 36 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: False positive glucose challenge test results are about six times more likely than true positive results in the general population. Pregnant women with false positive GDM screening results experience a significant decline in their perception of their own health. These adverse effects should be taken into account when deciding about a policy of screening all pregnant women for gestational diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9368868     DOI: 10.1177/096914139700400303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  6 in total

Review 1.  Screening for diabetes: what are we really doing?

Authors:  E Goyder; L Irwig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-12-12

Review 2.  Screening and subsequent management for gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Joanna Tieu; Philippa Middleton; Andrew J McPhee; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

3.  Point-of-Care HbA1c Testing with the A1cNow Test Kit in General Practice Dental Clinics: A Pilot Study Involving Its Accuracy and Practical Issues in Its Use.

Authors:  Shiela M Strauss; Mary Rosedale; Michael A Pesce; Caroline Juterbock; Navjot Kaur; Joe DePaola; Deborah Goetz; Mark S Wolff; Dolores Malaspina; Ann Danoff
Journal:  Point Care       Date:  2014-12

4.  Women's views on their diagnosis and management for borderline gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Shanshan Han; Philippa F Middleton; Tanya K Bubner; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 4.011

5.  Women's attitude towards prenatal screening for red blood cell antibodies, other than RhD.

Authors:  J M Koelewijn; T G M Vrijkotte; M de Haas; C E van der Schoot; G J Bonsel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Screening for type 2 diabetes is feasible, acceptable, but associated with increased short-term anxiety: a randomised controlled trial in British general practice.

Authors:  Paul Park; Rebecca K Simmons; A Toby Prevost; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.