C D Ricketts1. 1. 401 Teachers College, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0022, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between fat preference, dietary intake data and body composition in children. SUBJECT AND METHODS: Subjects studied were 88 children aged 9-12 y from two elementary schools in Ohio. Measures for dietary intake and body composition were obtained by 3 day diet records, anthropometrics, triceps and subscapular skinfolds. Fat preference data was assessed by hedonic rating of high and low fat snack foods. RESULTS: Data indicate that children who preferred the high fat snack items had high dietary fat intakes (r = 0.57, P < 0.05). Tricep skinfold measurement and BMI correlated positively with high fat food preferences (r = 0.51 and r = 0.46 P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest preference for high fat foods may occur due to diet composition and that increased adiposity may be associated with higher relative fat intakes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between fat preference, dietary intake data and body composition in children. SUBJECT AND METHODS: Subjects studied were 88 children aged 9-12 y from two elementary schools in Ohio. Measures for dietary intake and body composition were obtained by 3 day diet records, anthropometrics, triceps and subscapular skinfolds. Fat preference data was assessed by hedonic rating of high and low fat snack foods. RESULTS: Data indicate that children who preferred the high fat snack items had high dietary fat intakes (r = 0.57, P < 0.05). Tricep skinfold measurement and BMI correlated positively with high fat food preferences (r = 0.51 and r = 0.46 P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest preference for high fat foods may occur due to diet composition and that increased adiposity may be associated with higher relative fat intakes.
Authors: Aleksandra Januszek-Trzciąkowska; Ewa Małecka-Tendera; Katarzyna Klimek; Paweł Matusik Journal: Arch Med Sci Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 3.318
Authors: Richard D Telford; Ross B Cunningham; Rohan M Telford; Malcolm Riley; Walter P Abhayaratna Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240