Literature DB >> 9367283

Physiological effects of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate during incremental upper-body exercise.

T Weissland1, P Pelayo, J Vanvelcenaher, G Marais, J M Lavoie, H Robin.   

Abstract

The aims of the present study were: first, to assess the interindividual variations of a spontaneously chosen crank rate (SCCR) in relation to the power developed during an incremental upper body exercise on an arm ergometer set at a constant power regime, and second, to compare heart rate (HR) responses, expired minute ventilation (V[E]) and oxygen consumption (VO2) when the pedal rates were chosen spontaneously (T[SCCR]) or set at +/- 10% of the freely chosen rates (T[+10%] and T[-10%], respectively). The mean pedal rate values were linearly related (P < 0.01) with the power developed during arm cranking (r = 0.96), although large variations of pedalling rate strategies were observed between subjects. Maximal power (MP) and time to exhaustion values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) during T(SCCR) than during T(+10%) and T(-10%). Peak VO2 values were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in T(+10%) than in T(SCCR) and T(-10%). The increase in HR, V(E), and VO2 mean values, in relation to the increase in the power developed, was significantly higher (P < 0.05) when the pedal rate was set at plus 10% of the SCCR (T[+/-10%]) than in the two other conditions. The findings of the present study suggest that the use of an electromagnetically braked ergometer, which automatically adjusts the resistance component to maintain a constant work rate, should be used in order to achieve the highest MP values during an incremental upper body exercise. A 10% increase of the SCCR should be used in order to provide the highest peak VO2 value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9367283     DOI: 10.1007/s004210050272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  2 in total

1.  Maximal lactate steady state, respiratory compensation threshold and critical power.

Authors:  J Dekerle; B Baron; L Dupont; J Vanvelcenaher; P Pelayo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanical-ventilatory responses to peak and ventilation-matched upper- versus lower-body exercise in normal subjects.

Authors:  Nicholas B Tiller; Ian G Campbell; Lee M Romer
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.