L H Aiken1, J Sochalski, E T Lake. 1. Center for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6096, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The rapidly changing organizational context within which health care is delivered is altering provider-patient relations and processes of clinical decision-making, with significant implications for patient outcomes. Yet definitive research on such effects is lacking. The authors seek to underscore the contribution of organizational research to studies of clinical outcomes and demonstrates several approaches to further such efforts. METHODS: The authors present a theoretical framework of the operant mechanisms linking organizational attributes and patient outcomes. They use case examples from their ongoing research on hospitals to illustrate strategies for measuring these mechanisms and for overcoming some of the feasibility issues inherent in organizational research. RESULTS: Several methodological issues are explored: (1) exploiting "targets of opportunity" and "natural experiments" is a promising strategy for studying patient outcomes related to organizational reform; (2) indices of organizational traits, constructed from individual survey responses, can illuminate the operant mechanisms by which structure affects outcomes; and (3) secondary data sources and innovative statistical matching procedures provide a feasible strategy for constructing study comparison groups. Extending the organizational outcomes research strategy to new areas of inquiry offers an opportunity to enhance our understanding of how nursing organization affects outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the effectiveness of medical care in a health-care system undergoing fundamental restructuring requires greater understanding of how organizational context affects clinical outcomes. A higher priority should be placed on organizational outcomes research by researchers and funding agencies.
OBJECTIVES: The rapidly changing organizational context within which health care is delivered is altering provider-patient relations and processes of clinical decision-making, with significant implications for patient outcomes. Yet definitive research on such effects is lacking. The authors seek to underscore the contribution of organizational research to studies of clinical outcomes and demonstrates several approaches to further such efforts. METHODS: The authors present a theoretical framework of the operant mechanisms linking organizational attributes and patient outcomes. They use case examples from their ongoing research on hospitals to illustrate strategies for measuring these mechanisms and for overcoming some of the feasibility issues inherent in organizational research. RESULTS: Several methodological issues are explored: (1) exploiting "targets of opportunity" and "natural experiments" is a promising strategy for studying patient outcomes related to organizational reform; (2) indices of organizational traits, constructed from individual survey responses, can illuminate the operant mechanisms by which structure affects outcomes; and (3) secondary data sources and innovative statistical matching procedures provide a feasible strategy for constructing study comparison groups. Extending the organizational outcomes research strategy to new areas of inquiry offers an opportunity to enhance our understanding of how nursing organization affects outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Improving the effectiveness of medical care in a health-care system undergoing fundamental restructuring requires greater understanding of how organizational context affects clinical outcomes. A higher priority should be placed on organizational outcomes research by researchers and funding agencies.
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Jeannie P Cimiotti; Douglas M Sloane; Herbert L Smith; Linda Flynn; Donna F Neff Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Sean Clarke; Lusine Poghosyan; Eunhee Cho; Liming You; Mary Finlayson; Masako Kanai-Pak; Yupin Aungsuroch Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Eileen T Lake; Douglas Staiger; Erika Miles Edwards; Jessica G Smith; Jeannette A Rogowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.402