Literature DB >> 9366601

Quantitative risk assessment: an emerging tool for emerging foodborne pathogens.

A M Lammerding1, G M Paoli.   

Abstract

New challenges to the safety of the food supply require new strategies for evaluating and managing food safety risks. Changes in pathogens, food preparation, distribution, and consumption, and population immunity have the potential to adversely affect human health. Risk assessment offers a framework for predicting the impact of changes and trends on the provision of safe food. Risk assessment models facilitate the evaluation of active or passive changes in how foods are produced, processed, distributed, and consumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9366601      PMCID: PMC2640095          DOI: 10.3201/eid0304.970411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


  8 in total

1.  Monte Carlo techniques for quantitative uncertainty analysis in public health risk assessments.

Authors:  K M Thompson; D E Burmaster; E A Crouch
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  A regulatory perspective on the potential uses of microbial risk assessment in international trade.

Authors:  S C Hathaway; R L Cook
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Development of a quantitative risk assessment model for Salmonella enteritidis in pasteurized liquid eggs.

Authors:  R C Whiting; R L Buchanan
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1997-05-20       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 4.  The application of quantitative risk assessment to microbial food safety risks.

Authors:  L A Jaykus
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 7.624

Review 5.  Emerging foodborne diseases.

Authors:  S F Altekruse; M L Cohen; D L Swerdlow
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1997 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 6.  Changing epidemiology of food-borne disease: a Minnesota perspective.

Authors:  C W Hedberg; K L MacDonald; M T Osterholm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Sensitive populations: who is at the greatest risk?

Authors:  C P Gerba; J B Rose; C N Haas
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.277

Review 8.  Risk assessment, the environment, and public health.

Authors:  J V Rodricks
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  The risk of introduction of equine infectious anemia virus into USA via cloned horse embryos imported from Canada.

Authors:  B D Asseged; T Habtemariam; B Tameru; D Nganwa
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Isolation of Salmonella from ready-to-eat poultry meat and evaluation of its survival at low temperature, microwaving and simulated gastric fluids.

Authors:  Ali Akbar; Anil Kumar Anal
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Determination of the 50% human infectious dose for Norwalk virus.

Authors:  Robert L Atmar; Antone R Opekun; Mark A Gilger; Mary K Estes; Sue E Crawford; Frederick H Neill; Sasirekha Ramani; Heather Hill; Jennifer Ferreira; David Y Graham
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Risk, regulation and biotechnology: the case of GM crops.

Authors:  Stuart J Smyth; Peter W B Phillips
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.074

Review 5.  Biometric fingerprinting for visa application: device and procedure are risk factors for infection transmission.

Authors:  Jan A Jacobs; Marc Van Ranst
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.490

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.