Literature DB >> 9366330

Preservation of the anterior urethral ligamentous attachments in maintaining post-prostatectomy urinary continence: a comparative study.

B A Lowe1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The impact was determined on post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence of a technique preserving the anterior attachments of the proximal urethra to the posterior pubis by comparison to the results of other surgical methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urinary continence in 51 patients undergoing preservation of the anterior urethral attachments was compared to that of 70 patients undergoing an anatomical prostatectomy with resection of the bladder neck, 55 patients with preservation of the bladder neck and 14 patients undergoing a dorsal vein gathering procedure. Comparisons were made for rate of total continence, time to return of continence, incidence of extra organ disease and operative blood loss.
RESULTS: Total continence at 1 year was 84.3%, 89.1%, 85.7% and 100% respectively. Immediate total continence after catheter removal was seen in 25.5% after preservation of the anterior urethral attachments, 80.4% at 3 months compared to 41.4%, 50.9% and 50% at 3 months for anatomical prostatectomy with bladder neck resection, preservation and dorsal vein gathering. Clinical staging with the incidence of specimen confined disease was similar in all groups. Mean operative blood loss was 1,031 ml. for those patients undergoing anatomical prostatectomy compared to 681 ml. for those with preservation of the anterior urethral attachments.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the anterior urethral attachments results in improved urinary continence and lower operative blood loss without an increase in positive surgical margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9366330     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)68180-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Development of a novel classification system for anatomical variants of the puboprostatic ligaments with expert validation.

Authors:  Michael Kim; Shawna L Boyle; Alfonso Fernandez; Edward D Matsumoto; Kenneth T Pace; Maurice Anidjar; Gregory N Kozak; Sumit Davé; Blayne K Welk; Marjorie I Johnson; Stephen E Pautler
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Influence of bladder neck suspension stitches on early continence after radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized study of 180 patients.

Authors:  Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Martin Nicolaus; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Tim Häfner; George Sakellaropoulos; James Hicks; David Nikoleishvili; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Prospective predictors of urinary continence after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Michael G Oefelein
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Continence-preserving anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy: the "No-Touch" technique.

Authors:  M S Steiner
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.862

5.  A comparison of bladder neck preservation and bladder neck reconstruction for urinary incontinence after radical retro pubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Hossein Izadpanahi; Ramin Honarmand; Mohammad Hataf Khorrami; Mohammad Reza Najarzadegan; Mehrdad Mohammadi Sichani; Farshid Alizadeh
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.852

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.