Literature DB >> 9366300

Carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the treatment of surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma.

J Bellmunt1, A Ribas, N Eres, J Albanell, C Almanza, B Bermejo, L A Solé, J Baselga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The carboplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen M-CAVI (methotrexate, carboplatin, and vinblastine) is active against bladder carcinoma and can be administered to patients who are ineligible to receive cisplatin or doxorubicin. The authors designed a randomized study to evaluate whether M-CAVI offers a therapeutic advantage over the cisplatin-based regimen M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in the treatment of patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma.
METHODS: Patients with surgically incurable advanced bladder carcinoma were enrolled on a randomized trial comparing M-CAVI, which consists of carboplatin (300 mg/m2 on Day 2, adjusted using Calvert's formula for an area under the curve of 5), methotrexate (30 mg/m2 on Days 1, 15, and 22), and vinblastine (3 mg/m2 on Days 2, 15, and 22) administered every 28 days, versus standard M-VAC. The eligibility criteria included histologically proven bladder carcinoma, surgically incurable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred.
RESULTS: From January 1989 to January 1994, 47 assessable patients were included. Seventeen patients had lymph node disease and 30 had distant metastatic disease. Twenty-three patients were randomized to receive M-CAVI and 24 to receive M-VAC. Patient characteristics in the two groups were similar. Overall response rates were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-62%) for M-CAVI and 52% (95% CI, 30-73%) for M-VAC (P = 0.3), with 3 complete responses observed among patients treated with M-VAC and none among those in the M-CAVI group. M-VAC was associated with more gastrointestinal toxicity, stomatitis, alopecia, and Grade 4 neutropenia than M-CAVI. One toxicity-related death occurred in the M-VAC group. There was a statistically significant difference in median disease-related survival time favoring M-VAC (16 months; range, 6 to 22+) versus M-CAVI (9 months; range, 6 to 14+) (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: M-CAVI is less toxic but less active than M-VAC in the treatment of patients with advanced bladder carcinoma. Carboplatin-based regimens in which carboplatin is administered at the dose range used in the current study should be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin treatment. Further research is required to assess the impact of high dose carboplatin in the treatment of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9366300     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971115)80:10<1966::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  47 in total

1.  Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986.

Authors:  Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Thierry Gil; Sandrine Marreaud; Gedske Daugaard; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandra Collette; Julie Lorent; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Current management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  G Sancho; P Maroto; J Palou
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Guru Sonpavde; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Sequential chemotherapy using gemcitabine + carboplatin followed by gemcitabine + carboplatin + docetaxel for advanced upper-tract urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Yoneyama; Atsushi Imai; Shingo Hatakeyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Treatment Approaches for Cisplatin-Ineligible Patients with Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David J Einstein; Guru Sonpavde
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-11

6.  Randomized phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC Intergroup Study 30987.

Authors:  Joaquim Bellmunt; Hans von der Maase; Graham M Mead; Iwona Skoneczna; Maria De Santis; Gedske Daugaard; Andreas Boehle; Christine Chevreau; Luis Paz-Ares; Leslie R Laufman; Eric Winquist; Derek Raghavan; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester; Ronald de Wit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Feasiblity study of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered every two weeks in patients with advanced urothelial tumors and impaired renal function.

Authors:  Joan Carles; Cristina Suárez; Carlos Mesía; Miquel Nogué; Albert Font; Montserrat Doménech; Marta Suárez; Ignasi Tusquets; M Gallén; Joan Albanell; Xavier Fabregat
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 8.  Bladder cancer.

Authors:  David J Gallagher; Matthew I Milowsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-08

9.  Impact of renal function on treatment options and outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bercin Kutluk Cenik; Han Sun; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/ carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer "unfit" for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: phase II--results of EORTC study 30986.

Authors:  Maria De Santis; Joaquim Bellmunt; Graham Mead; J Martijn Kerst; Michael Leahy; Pablo Maroto; Iwona Skoneczna; Sandrine Marreaud; Ronald de Wit; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.