Literature DB >> 9364761

Individual differences in the memory representation of emotional episodes: exploring the cognitive processes in repression.

U Schimmack1, K Hartmann.   

Abstract

Two studies investigated the influence of a repressive coping style on the availability and accessibility of emotion memories. In Study 1 participants rated the presence and intensity of emotions in several scenarios and then estimated the frequency of emotions in the scenarios. Repressors did not process the scenarios more superficially. Repressors indicated the presence of unpleasant emotions in the scenarios less frequently, but not less intensely. The frequency differences accounted for most of the repression effects in the latter frequency judgments. In Study 2 participants judged the frequency of emotions twice a day for 2 weeks and then judged the frequency of emotions for the 1st and 2nd week. Repression effects in the frequency judgments did not increase with longer retention intervals. The results indicate that a repressive coping style influences mainly the experience of emotions but not so much the accessibility of emotion memories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9364761     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.5.1064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  3 in total

1.  Intact implicit and reduced explicit memory for negative self-related information in repressive coping.

Authors:  Esther Fujiwara; Brian Levine; Adam K Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Influence of repressive coping style on cortical activation during encoding of angry faces.

Authors:  Astrid Veronika Rauch; Lena Ter Horst; Victoria Gabriele Paul; Jochen Bauer; Udo Dannlowski; Carsten Konrad; Patricia Ohrmann; Harald Kugel; Boris Egloff; Volker Arolt; Thomas Suslow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Memory for pictures of sexual assault: Sensitive maintenance of ambiguous stimuli.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Peters; Michael Hock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.