Literature DB >> 9364074

Dissociable forms of inhibitory control within prefrontal cortex with an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: restriction to novel situations and independence from "on-line" processing.

R Dias1, T W Robbins, A C Roberts.   

Abstract

Attentional set-shifting and discrimination reversal are sensitive to prefrontal damage in the marmoset in a manner qualitatively similar to that seen in man and Old World monkeys, respectively (Dias et al., 1996b). Preliminary findings have demonstrated that although lateral but not orbital prefrontal cortex is the critical locus in shifting an attentional set between perceptual dimensions, orbital but not lateral prefrontal cortex is the critical locus in reversing a stimulus-reward association within a particular perceptual dimension (Dias et al., 1996a). The present study presents this analysis in full and extends the results in three main ways by demonstrating that (1) mechanisms of inhibitory control and "on-line" processing are independent within the prefrontal cortex, (2) impairments in inhibitory control induced by prefrontal damage are restricted to novel situations, and (3) those prefrontal areas involved in the suppression of previously established response sets are not involved in the acquisition of such response sets. These findings suggest that inhibitory control is a general process that operates across functionally distinct regions within the prefrontal cortex. Although damage to lateral prefrontal cortex causes a loss of inhibitory control in attentional selection, damage to orbitofrontal cortex causes a loss of inhibitory control in affective processing. These findings provide an explanation for the apparent discrepancy between human and nonhuman primate studies in which disinhibition as measured on the Wisconsin Card Sort Test is associated with dorsolateral prefrontal damage, whereas disinhibition as measured on discrimination reversal is associated with orbitofrontal damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9364074      PMCID: PMC6573594     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  25 in total

1.  A specific form of cognitive rigidity following excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in marmosets.

Authors:  A C Roberts; T W Robbins; B J Everitt; J L Muir
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 2.  Developmental time course in human infants and infant monkeys, and the neural bases of, inhibitory control in reaching.

Authors:  A Diamond
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Ventral prefrontal cortex is not essential for working memory.

Authors:  M F Rushworth; P D Nixon; M J Eacott; R E Passingham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Impairments in selective attention to visual stimuli in monkeys with inferotemporal and lateral striate lesions.

Authors:  C M Butter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts.

Authors:  R Dias; T W Robbins; A C Roberts
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The problem of the frontal lobe: a reinterpretation.

Authors:  W J Nauta
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 7.  The frontal cortex-basal ganglia system in primates.

Authors:  S P Wise; E A Murray; C R Gerfen
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  1996

8.  Effects of frontal lobe lesions on hypothesis sampling during concept formation.

Authors:  K D Cicerone; R M Lazar; W R Shapiro
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Contrasting mechanisms of impaired attentional set-shifting in patients with frontal lobe damage or Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  A M Owen; A C Roberts; J R Hodges; B A Summers; C E Polkey; T W Robbins
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates.

Authors:  A C Roberts; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  1988-11
View more
  153 in total

1.  Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task.

Authors:  V Menon; N E Adleman; C D White; G H Glover; A L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The effects of dopamine D(1) receptor blockade in the prelimbic-infralimbic areas on behavioral flexibility.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Involvement of the prelimbic-infralimbic areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex in behavioral flexibility for place and response learning.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; S Detrick; R P Kesner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: an individual-differences perspective.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Randall W Engle
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: a computational model.

Authors:  M J Frank; B Loughry; R C O'Reilly
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Dopamine tunes prefrontal outputs to orchestrate aversive processing.

Authors:  Caitlin M Vander Weele; Cody A Siciliano; Kay M Tye
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  The use of α-2A adrenergic agonists for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Amy F T Arnsten
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.618

8.  Executive and social behaviors under nicotinic receptor regulation.

Authors:  Sylvie Granon; Philippe Faure; Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Aged rats are impaired on an attentional set-shifting task sensitive to medial frontal cortex damage in young rats.

Authors:  Morgan D Barense; Matthew T Fox; Mark G Baxter
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  The role of prefrontal dopamine D1 receptors in the neural mechanisms of associative learning.

Authors:  M Victoria Puig; Earl K Miller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.