PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy seen in ovarian cancer patients treated with escalating doses of intraperitoneal (I.P.) interleukin-2 (IL-2) by two different infusion schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were sequentially entered onto a phase I/II study in groups of four at fixed dosage tiers of 6 x 10(4), 6 x 10(5), 6 x 10(6), and 3 x 10(7) IU/m2/d in either of two schedules: (A) intermittent weekly infusions of 24 hours' duration; or (B) alternating continuous 7-day infusions followed by 7-day intervals without therapy. Eligibility criteria included > or = six courses of prior platinum-based chemotherapyand laparotomy-confirmed persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Forty-one eligible patients received I.P. IL-2 and were assessable for toxicity, but six patients were not assessable for response, which left 35 patients assessable for response. Significant locoregional dose-limiting toxicity was seen with the 7-day infusions (including bowel perforation), with 600,000 IU/m2 as the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), but catheter infection was the only significant complication seen with the 24-hour infusions, for which an MTD was not established. Among 35 assessable patients, there were six laparotomy-confirmed complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses, for an overall response rate of 25.7% (nine of 35). The median survival time of the cohort was 13.7 months and the overall 5-year survival probability was 13.9%. For the nine patients who demonstrated responses (six on the 24-hour infusion and three on the 7-day infusion), the median survival time has not been reached (range, 27 to 90+ months). CONCLUSION: I.P. IL-2 is better tolerated as a weekly infusion as compared with a 7-day infusion and demonstrates evidence of possible long-term efficacy in a modest number of patients. A randomized trial is indicated to determine if the prolonged survival seen in this study is a due to I.P. IL-2 therapy or other factors that cannot be controlled for in a single-arm study.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the toxicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy seen in ovarian cancerpatients treated with escalating doses of intraperitoneal (I.P.) interleukin-2 (IL-2) by two different infusion schedules. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were sequentially entered onto a phase I/II study in groups of four at fixed dosage tiers of 6 x 10(4), 6 x 10(5), 6 x 10(6), and 3 x 10(7) IU/m2/d in either of two schedules: (A) intermittent weekly infusions of 24 hours' duration; or (B) alternating continuous 7-day infusions followed by 7-day intervals without therapy. Eligibility criteria included > or = six courses of prior platinum-based chemotherapy and laparotomy-confirmed persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Forty-one eligible patients received I.P. IL-2 and were assessable for toxicity, but six patients were not assessable for response, which left 35 patients assessable for response. Significant locoregional dose-limiting toxicity was seen with the 7-day infusions (including bowel perforation), with 600,000 IU/m2 as the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), but catheter infection was the only significant complication seen with the 24-hour infusions, for which an MTD was not established. Among 35 assessable patients, there were six laparotomy-confirmed complete responses (CRs) and three partial responses, for an overall response rate of 25.7% (nine of 35). The median survival time of the cohort was 13.7 months and the overall 5-year survival probability was 13.9%. For the nine patients who demonstrated responses (six on the 24-hour infusion and three on the 7-day infusion), the median survival time has not been reached (range, 27 to 90+ months). CONCLUSION: I.P. IL-2 is better tolerated as a weekly infusion as compared with a 7-day infusion and demonstrates evidence of possible long-term efficacy in a modest number of patients. A randomized trial is indicated to determine if the prolonged survival seen in this study is a due to I.P. IL-2 therapy or other factors that cannot be controlled for in a single-arm study.
Authors: Andrea R Hagemann; Ian S Hagemann; Mark Cadungog; Wei-Ting Hwang; Priya Patel; Priti Lal; Rachel Hammond; Phyllis A Gimotty; Christina S Chu; Steven C Rubin; Michael J Birrer; Daniel J Powell; Michael D Feldman; George Coukos Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Lana E Kandalaft; Nathan Singh; John B Liao; Andrea Facciabene; Jonathan S Berek; Daniel J Powell; George Coukos Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 5.482