Literature DB >> 9363338

Mechanical performance of polyurethane ureteral stents in vitro and ex vivo.

S P Gorman1, D S Jones, M C Bonner, M Akay, P F Keane.   

Abstract

A serious problem associated with the use of ureteral stents is fracture in situ. Following clinical observations of fracture of polyurethane stents in vivo, this study examined the mechanical properties of 17 polyurethane stents (double-J containing drainage holes) retrieved from patients over a 24-week period of insertion. In addition, stents were immersed in human and artificial urine in an in vitro model at 37 degrees C to determine their general propensity to fracture. Mechanical properties of ureteral stents were examined using the standard ASTM D-412 tensile test and by the novel application of dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The ultimate tensile strength and elongation at break (but not the Young's modulus) of unused polyurethane stent sections containing side-drainage holes were greater than stent sections devoid of side-drainage holes. No correlations were observed between increased or decreased Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength or elongation at break of polyurethane stents and their time of immersion in either human urine or artificial urine in simulated upper urinary tract conditions of 37 degrees C and 5% CO2. Similarly, no correlations were observed between Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength or elongation of polyurethane stents and stent dwell time in situ. DMA of retrieved stents revealed that their tan delta value and storage modulus did not differ significantly from unused stents following dwell times in situ of up to 24 weeks. No changes in the glass transition temperatures were observed in retrieved stents. Although patient variation was observed, the results indicate that the polyurethane stents examined in vitro and following removal from patients did not exhibit any greater propensity to fracture than their unused counterparts. Fracture of retrieved polyurethane stents, arising in vivo and also during subsequent tensile testing, was observed to occur along the drainage holes, suggesting that elimination of these holes will reduce the incidence of polyurethane ureteral stent fracture in use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9363338     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00070-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  13 in total

1.  The effect of ureteric stents on urine flow: reflux.

Authors:  L J Cummings; S L Waters; J A D Wattis; S J Graham
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Design of a simulated urethra model for the quantitative assessment of urinary catheter lubricity.

Authors:  D S Jones; C P Garvin; S P Gorman
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Physicochemical characterisation and biological evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine engineered polyurethane (Tecoflex(®)).

Authors:  Anand P Khandwekar; Mukesh Doble
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Effect of uropathogens on in vitro encrustation of polyurethane double J ureteral stents.

Authors:  Nandakumar Venkatesan; Sunil Shroff; Karthik Jeyachandran; Mukesh Doble
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-06-02

5.  Spontaneous fracture of indwelling polyurethane ureteral stents: A case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Michael E Chua; Marcelino L Morales
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Physicochemical characterization of hexetidine-impregnated endotracheal tube poly(vinyl chloride) and resistance to adherence of respiratory bacterial pathogens.

Authors:  David S Jones; James G McGovern; A David Woolfson; Colin G Adair; Sean P Gorman
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Comparison of silicone versus polyurethane ureteral stents: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Nariman Gadzhiev; Dmitry Gorelov; Vigen Malkhasyan; Gagik Akopyan; Revaz Harchelava; Denis Mazurenko; Christina Kosmala; Zhamshid Okhunov; Sergei Petrov
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Assessment of bio-safety of low-cost polyurethane urologic stents used in developing countries.

Authors:  Nobhojit Roy; Santosh Waingankar; Gaurav Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-04

9.  Investigating the flow dynamics in the obstructed and stented ureter by means of a biomimetic artificial model.

Authors:  Francesco Clavica; Xuefeng Zhao; Motaz ElMahdy; Marcus J Drake; Xunli Zhang; Dario Carugo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials.

Authors:  Ali Mosayyebi; Costantino Manes; Dario Carugo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.