Literature DB >> 9362855

Early or late bath during the first stage of labour: a randomised study of 200 women.

M Eriksson1, L A Mattsson, L Ladfors.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric outcome after a bath offered to women on two different occasions during the first stage of labour. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early bath affected the progress of labour and the use of analgesia when compared with a late bath during the first stage of labour.
DESIGN: A randomised prospective pilot-study.
SETTING: The delivery ward at Ostra Hospital in Göteborg. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred women, at low obstetric risk.
INTERVENTIONS: The women were randomised to either the 'early bath group' or the 'late bath group'. The women in the 'early bath group' had a bath before a cervical dilatation of 5 cm, while the women in the 'late bath group' had a bath after the cervix was 5 cm dilated. MEASUREMENTS AND
FINDINGS: The women in the 'early bath group' had a longer time period from established labour to delivery (9.8 hours) compared to the 'late bath group' (8.5 hours) (p < 0.004). A higher proportion of women in the 'early bath group' needed oxytocin administration (57%) compared to the 'late bath group' (30%) (p < 0.01). Epidural analgesia was used by 27% of the women in the 'early bath group' and by 9% in the 'late bath group' (p < 0.001). One baby in the 'early bath group' had clinical signs of infection and required antibiotic treatment. No cases of amnionitis or endometritis were present in the women. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings suggest that a bath during the first stage of labour should preferably be used after a cervical dilatation of 5 cm to avoid prolonged labour, and an increased use of oxytocin and epidural analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9362855     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(97)90005-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-24

Review 2.  Immersion in water in labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-04-15

3.  Factors Associated With Normal Physiologic Birth for Women Who Labor In Water: A Secondary Analysis of A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Jane Carpenter; Ethel Burns; Lesley Smith
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 4.  Immersion in water during labour and birth.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Cluett; Ethel Burns; Anna Cuthbert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-16

5.  Immersion in water for pain relief and the risk of intrapartum transfer among low risk nulliparous women: secondary analysis of the Birthplace national prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mirjam Lukasse; Rachel Rowe; John Townend; Marian Knight; Jennifer Hollowell
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.