Literature DB >> 9362356

Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

J L Raoul1, D Guyader, J F Bretagne, J F Heautot, R Duvauferrier, P Bourguet, D Bekhechi, Y M Deugnier, M Gosselin.   

Abstract

Intra-arterial injection of radioactive Lipiodol has shown promising results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal obstruction. The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with HCC. From September 1990 to September 1993, 142 patients (135 men, 7 women; age: 65 +/- 6.6 years) were randomly assigned to treatment groups and given either intra-arterial injections of 131I-labeled Lipiodol (60 mCi; 2.2 GBq) (n = 73) or chemoembolization (70 mg cisplatin) (n = 69). Subsequent injections were given at 2, 5, 8, 12, and 18 months. Tumor response was assessed on the basis of tumor size and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Patient tolerance was assessed clinically and angiographically. Survival rate was the main end-point. A total of 129 patients (65 in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group and 64 in the chemoembolization group) were available for analysis; 13 were excluded, mainly because of portal vein thrombosis. The two groups were comparable. Actuarial survival curves were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall survival rates at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 69%, 38%, 22%, 14%, and 10%, and 66%, 42%, 22%, 3%, and 0% in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Reduction in tumor size was similar for the two groups, with complete response in 1 and 0 patients and partial response in 15 and 16 patients in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Tolerance was significantly better in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group both clinically (3 severe side effects vs. 29 in the chemoembolization group; P < .001) and angiographically (1 arterial thrombosis vs. 10 in the chemoembolization group; P < .01). In terms of patient survival and tumor response, radioactive 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization were equally effective in the treatment of HCC, but tolerance to 131I-labeled Lipiodol was significantly better.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9362356     DOI: 10.1002/hep.510260511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  50 in total

Review 1.  Radioembolization for primary and metastatic liver cancer.

Authors:  Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Ahsun Riaz; Mary F Mulcahy; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.934

2.  EANM procedure guideline for the treatment of liver cancer and liver metastases with intra-arterial radioactive compounds.

Authors:  Francesco Giammarile; Lisa Bodei; Carlo Chiesa; Glenn Flux; Flavio Forrer; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere; Boudewijn Brans; Bieke Lambert; Mark Konijnenberg; Françoise Borson-Chazot; Jan Tennvall; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Therapy options for treatment of hepatic malignancy.

Authors:  Teresa Szyszko; Alison Brooks; Paul Tait; Domenico Rubello; Adil AL-Nahhas
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma--cause, treatment and metastasis.

Authors:  Z Y Tang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Multimodality treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor thrombi in portal vein.

Authors:  J Fan; Z Q Wu; Z Y Tang; J Zhou; S J Qiu; Z C Ma; X D Zhou; S L Ye
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences.

Authors:  Yì-Xiáng J Wáng; Thierry De Baere; Jean-Marc Idée; Sébastien Ballet
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Intra-arterial treatment with ⁹⁰Y microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma: 4 years experience at the Ghent University Hospital.

Authors:  Bieke Lambert; Emiel Sturm; Jeroen Mertens; Ruth Oltenfreiter; Peter Smeets; Roberto Troisi; Hans Van Vlierberghe; Luc Defreyne
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  Combined interventional therapies of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Qian; Gan-Sheng Feng; Thomas Vogl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Liver embolizations in oncology. A review. Part II. Arterial radioembolizations, portal venous embolizations, experimental arterial embolization procedures.

Authors:  Peter Gunvén
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 10.  Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with intra-arterial injection of radionuclides.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Raoul; Eveline Boucher; Yan Rolland; Etienne Garin
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.