Literature DB >> 9362329

A conserved cytoplasmic region of ROMK modulates pH sensitivity, conductance, and gating.

H Choe1, H Zhou, L G Palmer, H Sackin.   

Abstract

ROMK channels play a key role in overall K balance by controlling K secretion across the apical membrane of mammalian cortical collecting tubule. In contrast to the family of strong inward rectifiers (IRKs), ROMK channels are markedly sensitive to intracellular pH. Using Xenopus oocytes, we have confirmed this pH sensitivity at both the single-channel and whole cell level. Reduction of oocyte pH from 6.8 to 6.4 (using a permeant acetate buffer) reduced channel open probability from 0.76 +/- 0.02 to near zero (n = 8), without altering single-channel conductance. This was due to the appearance of a long-lived closed state at low internal pH. We have confirmed that a lysine residue (K61 on ROMK2; K80 on ROMK1), NH2 terminal to the first putative transmembrane segment (M1), is primarily responsible for conferring a steep pH sensitivity to ROMK (B. Fakler, J. Schultz, J. Yang, U. Schulte, U. Bråandle, H. P. Zenner, L. Y. Jan, and J. P. Ruppersberg. EMBO J. 15: 4093-4099, 1996). However, the apparent pKa of ROMK also depends on another residue in a highly conserved, mildly hydrophobic area: T51 on ROMK2 (T70 on ROMK1). Replacing this neutral threonine (T51) with a negatively charged glutamate shifted the apparent pKa for inward conductance from 6.5 +/- 0.01 (n = 8, wild type) to 7.0 +/- 0.02 (n = 5, T51E). On the other hand, replacing T51 with a positively charged lysine shifted the apparent pKa in the opposite direction, from 6.5 +/- 0.01 (n = 8, wild type) to 6.0 +/- 0.02 (n = 9, T51K). The opposite effects of the glutamate and lysine substitutions at position 51 (ROMK2) are consistent with a model in which T51 is physically close to K61 and alters either the local pH or the apparent pKa via an electrostatic mechanism. In addition to its effects on pH sensitivity, the mutation T51E also decreased single-channel conductance from 34.0 +/- 1.0 pS (n = 8, wild type) to 17.4 +/- 1 pS (n = 9, T51E), reversed the voltage gating of the channel, and significantly increased open-channel noise. These effects on single-channel currents suggest that the T51 residue, located in a mildly hydrophobic area of ROMK2, also interacts with the hydrophobic region of the permeation pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9362329     DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.1997.273.4.F516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  58 in total

1.  Effects of intra- and extracellular acidifications on single channel Kir2.3 currents.

Authors:  G Zhu; S Chanchevalap; N Cui; C Jiang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Molecular mechanism of a COOH-terminal gating determinant in the ROMK channel revealed by a Bartter's disease mutation.

Authors:  Thomas P Flagg; Dana Yoo; Christopher M Sciortino; Margaret Tate; Michael F Romero; Paul A Welling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A conserved arginine near the filter of Kir1.1 controls Rb/K selectivity.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; D Eric Walters
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.581

4.  Permeant cations and blockers modulate pH gating of ROMK channels.

Authors:  H Sackin; A Vasilyev; L G Palmer; M Krambis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  The pore helix is involved in stabilizing the open state of inwardly rectifying K+ channels.

Authors:  Noga Alagem; Semen Yesylevskyy; Eitan Reuveny
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransport: structural and equilibrium thermodynamic considerations.

Authors:  I Kurtz; D Petrasek; S Tatishchev
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 1.843

7.  Potassium-dependent activation of Kir4.2 K⁺ channels.

Authors:  Johan M Edvinsson; Anish J Shah; Lawrence G Palmer
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Residues at the outer mouth of Kir1.1 determine K-dependent gating.

Authors:  Henry Sackin; Mikheil Nanazashvili; Hui Li; Lawrence G Palmer; Lei Yang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Random mutagenesis screening indicates the absence of a separate H(+)-sensor in the pH-sensitive Kir channels.

Authors:  Jennifer J Paynter; Lijun Shang; Murali K Bollepalli; Thomas Baukrowitz; Stephen J Tucker
Journal:  Channels (Austin)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.581

10.  Molecular basis of decreased Kir4.1 function in SeSAME/EAST syndrome.

Authors:  David M Williams; Coeli M B Lopes; Avia Rosenhouse-Dantsker; Heather L Connelly; Alessandra Matavel; Jin O-Uchi; Elena McBeath; Daniel A Gray
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.