Literature DB >> 9361666

Utility of ultrasound to assess risk of fracture.

S Cheng1, F Tylavsky, L Carbone.   

Abstract

Traditional assessments of bone properties have utilized densitometry techniques such as Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). Recently, quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has been introduced as an alternative method of assessing bone properties. Advantages of QUS over X-ray techniques include low costs, portability, and nonionizing radiation. Proponents of QUS have claimed that this technology can provide information not only about the density but also about the structure and mechanical properties of bone. There are two major questions that need to be answered for those who seek to diagnose bone disorders with ultrasound: (1) what does quantitative ultrasound actually measure, and, even more importantly, (2) what is its clinical utility? In this review we will briefly examine the first question and will focus on the utility of ultrasound in clinical trials to discriminate between fractures and non-fractures and to predict the risk of fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9361666     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02940.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  8 in total

Review 1.  Bone fractal analysis.

Authors:  Gian Pietro Feltrin; Roberto Stramare; Diego Miotto; Dario Giacomini; Claudio Saccavini
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Lifestyle factors affecting heel ultrasound in Greek females across different life stages.

Authors:  Eirini Babaroutsi; Faidon Magkos; Yannis Manios; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Fractal lacunarity of trabecular bone and magnetic resonance imaging: New perspectives for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment.

Authors:  Annamaria Zaia
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  The effect of age, weight, and lifestyle factors on calcaneal quantitative ultrasound: the ESOPO study.

Authors:  Silvano Adami; Sandro Giannini; Ruben Giorgino; GianCarlo Isaia; Stefania Maggi; Luigi Sinigaglia; Paolo Filipponi; Gaetano Crepaldi; Ombretta Di Munno
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prediction of trabecular bone qualitative properties using scanning quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  Yi-Xian Qin; Wei Lin; Erik Mittra; Yi Xia; Jiqi Cheng; Stefan Judex; Clint Rubin; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.413

Review 6.  New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Bone loss. Quantitative imaging techniques for assessing bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C F Njeh; H K Genant
Journal:  Arthritis Res       Date:  2000-08-03

8.  A new technique for precisely and accurately measuring lumbar spine bone mineral density in mice using clinical dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Ranjitha Katikaneni; Adharsh Ponnapakkam; Eric Miller; Tulasi Ponnapakkam; Robert C Gensure
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.987

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.