Literature DB >> 9361442

Specific detection and confirmation of Campylobacter jejuni by DNA hybridization and PCR.

L K Ng1, C I Kingombe, W Yan, D E Taylor, K Hiratsuka, N Malik, M M Garcia.   

Abstract

Conventional detection and confirmation methods for Campylobacter jejuni are lengthy and tedious. A rapid hybridization protocol in which a 1,475-bp chromogen-labelled DNA probe (pDT1720) and Campylobacter strains filtered and grown on 0.22-micron-pore-size hydrophobic grid membrane filters (HGMFs) are used was developed. Among the environmental and clinical isolates of C. jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni subsp. doylei, Campylobacter lari, and Arcobacter nitrofigilis and a panel of 310 unrelated bacterial strains tested, only C. jejuni and C. jejuni subsp. doylei isolates hybridized with the probe under stringent conditions. The specificity of the probe was confirmed when the protocol was applied to spiked skim milk and chicken rinse samples. Based on the nucleotide sequence of pDT1720, a pair of oligonucleotide primers was designed for PCR amplification of DNA from Campylobacter spp. and other food pathogens grown overnight in selective Mueller-Hinton broth with cefoperazone and growth supplements. All C. jejuni strains tested, including DNase-producing strains and C. jejuni subsp. doylei, produced a specific 402-bp amplicon, as confirmed by restriction and Southern blot analysis. The detection range of the assay was as low as 3 CFU per PCR to as high as 10(5) CFU per PCR for pure cultures. Overnight enrichment of chicken rinse samples spiked initially with as little as approximately 10 CFU/ml produced amplicons after the PCR. No amplicon was detected with any of the other bacterial strains tested or from the chicken background microflora. Since C. jejuni is responsible for 99% of Campylobacter contamination in poultry, PCR and HGMF hybridization were performed on naturally contaminated chicken rinse samples, and the results were compared with the results of conventional cultural isolation on Preston agar. All samples confirmed to be culture positive for C. jejuni were also identified by DNA hybridization and PCR amplification, thus confirming that these DNA-based technologies are suitable alternatives to time-consuming conventional detection methods. DNA hybridization, besides being sensitive, also has the potential to be used in direct enumeration of C. jejuni organisms in chicken samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9361442      PMCID: PMC168775          DOI: 10.1128/aem.63.11.4558-4563.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  12 in total

1.  Benchmarking--a conversation with Robert C. Camp. The source. Interview by Joe Flower.

Authors:  R C Camp
Journal:  Healthc Forum J       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb

2.  The magnetic immuno-polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Campylobacter in milk and poultry.

Authors:  L Docherty; M R Adams; P Patel; J McFadden
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.858

3.  Use of non-radioactive DNA probes for detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in stool specimens.

Authors:  D E Taylor; K Hiratsuka
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Detection of the coccoid form of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken products with the use of the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  W Hazeleger; C Arkesteijn; A Toorop-Bouma; R Beumer
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.277

5.  A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli.

Authors:  F J Bolton; L Robertson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Specific detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by using polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B A Oyofo; S A Thornton; D H Burr; T J Trust; O R Pavlovskis; P Guerry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Discrimination among thermophilic Campylobacter species by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 23S rRNA gene fragments.

Authors:  M Eyers; S Chapelle; G Van Camp; H Goossens; R De Wachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Development of species-specific DNA probes for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting.

Authors:  B A Giesendorf; A van Belkum; A Koeken; H Stegeman; M H Henkens; J van der Plas; H Goossens; H G Niesters; W G Quint
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid identification of Campylobacter species using oligonucleotide probes to 16S ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  P J Romaniuk; T J Trust
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Detection of Campylobacter jejuni added to foods by using a combined selective enrichment and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA).

Authors:  M Uyttendaele; R Schukkink; B van Gemen; J Debevere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Specific detection of Arcobacter and Campylobacter strains in water and sewage by PCR and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Yolanda Moreno; Salut Botella; José Luis Alonso; María A Ferrús; Manuel Hernández; Javier Hernández
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A real-time PCR assay for the detection of Campylobacter jejuni in foods after enrichment culture.

Authors:  Andrew D Sails; Andrew J Fox; Frederick J Bolton; David R A Wareing; David L A Greenway
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Detection of small numbers of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli cells in environmental water, sewage, and food samples by a seminested PCR assay.

Authors:  A S Waage; T Vardund; V Lund; G Kapperud
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Development of an indirect competitive ELISA for detection of Campylobacter jejuni subsp.jejuni O:23 in foods.

Authors:  I Hochel; D Viochna; J Skvor; M Musil
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Development of a strain-specific molecular method for quantitating individual campylobacter strains in mixed populations.

Authors:  Karen T Elvers; Christopher R Helps; Trudy M Wassenaar; Vivien M Allen; Diane G Newell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Species identification of Campylobacter jejuni ssp. jejuni and C. coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and PCR.

Authors:  R Kolínská; M Drevínek; V Jakubů; H Zemlicková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  ISOLATION AND MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIALLY PATHOGENIC Escherichia coli AND Campylobacter jejuni IN FERAL PIGEONS FROM AN URBAN AREA IN THE CITY OF LIMA, PERU.

Authors:  Moisés Caballero; Isabel Rivera; Luis M Jara; Francisco M Ulloa-Stanojlovic; Carlos Shiva
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.846

Review 8.  DNA sequencing, genomes and genetic markers of microbes on fruits and vegetables.

Authors:  Youming Shen; Jiyun Nie; Lixue Kuang; Jianyi Zhang; Haifei Li
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.813

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.