| Literature DB >> 9358591 |
H Ragde1, J C Blasko, P D Grimm, G M Kenny, J Sylvester, D C Hoak, W Cavanagh, K Landin.
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in interstitial radiation as a cost-effective and efficient method of treating organ-confined prostate cancer. We describe our 7- and 8-year results with transperineal Iodine-125 and Palladium-103 implantation. A total of 551 consecutive patients were treated. Of these, 320/551 (58%) received implant alone (Group I), and 231/551 (42%)--considered higher risk patients--were also treated with a modest dose (45 Gy) of external beam irradiation (Group II). The median follow-up for Group I was 55 months, and for Group II, 60 months. At 7 years, the actuarial freedom from biochemical failure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < or = 1.0 ng/mL) was 80% in Group I patients, and, at 8 years, 65% in Group II patients. Morbidity was minimal if patients had not undergone prior transurethral prostate resections. The results indicate that interstitial radiation is a valid treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9358591 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(199711/12)13:6<438::aid-ssu8>3.0.co;2-b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Semin Surg Oncol ISSN: 1098-2388