Literature DB >> 9358480

Is dispersion of ventricular repolarization rate dependent?

M Zabel1, R L Woosley, M R Franz.   

Abstract

QT dispersion has been adopted as a new index for the noninvasive assessment of the inhomogeneity of repolarization and has been evaluated in several clinical studies as an index of arrhythmia propensity. In most of these studies, indices of dispersion of repolarization were rate corrected by the Bazett formula calculating QT dispersion as QT cmax-QT cmin or JT dispersion as JT cmax-JT cmin, implying that dispersion of repolarization also changes with heart rate. This study aimed to determine in the electrically paced isolated heart whether dispersion of ventricular repolarization is rate dependent. Multiple (5-7) monophasic action potentials (MAPs) were recorded simultaneously from the epicardium and endocardium of both ventricles in 18 isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Hearts were paced from a right ventricular site at basic cycle lengths (CL) between 1,200 and 300 ms in 100-ms decrements. Action potential duration was measured at 90% repolarization (APD90), and recovery time (RT) was defined as the sum of APD90 and activation time in each of the simultaneous MAP recordings. The dispersion of APD90 and RT, respectively, were calculated as the maximal difference among all recordings. APD90 and RT shortened continuously throughout the range of paced steady-state CLs from 1,200 to 300 ms. APD90 was 197.6 +/- 6.1 ms at a CL of 1,200 ms and decreased to 148.5 +/- 2.5 ms at a CL of 300 ms (P < 0.0001). RT was 228.2 +/- 6.2 ms at a CL of 1,000 ms and decreased to 175.9 +/- 2.9 at a CL of 300 ms (P < 0.0001). In contrast, dispersion of APD90 and RT did not change significantly. Dispersion of APD90 was 24.8 +/- 2.3 ms at a CL of 1,200 ms, 26.1 +/- 1.9 msec at a CL of 1,000 ms, and 21.6 +/- 2.1 at a CL of 300 ms (NS). Dispersion of RT was 29.7 +/- 3.4 ms at a CL of 1,200 ms, 29.0 +/- 3.0 ms at a CL of 1,000 ms, and 32.7 +/- 3.2 ms at a CL of 300 ms (NS). In contrast to the duration of the QT interval, dispersion of ventricular repolarization does not change significantly with pacing induced changes in CL. Assuming that the rate-dependent behavior of action potential duration is similar between the rabbit and human heart, a rate correction of parameters of dispersion of repolarization is probably unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9358480     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb06078.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  9 in total

1.  Correction for heart rate is not necessary for QT dispersion in individuals without structural heart disease and patients with ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Vassilios P Vassilikos; Labros A Karagounis; Apostolos Psichogios; Themistoclis Maounis; John Iakovou; Antonis S Manolis; Dennis V Cokkinos
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  QT dispersion increases with aging.

Authors:  Bunyamin Yavuz; Onur Sinan Deveci; Burcu Balam Yavuz; Meltem Halil; Kudret Aytemir; Mustafa Cankurtaran; Giray Kabakci; Baris Kaya; Servet Ariogul; Ali Oto
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  [Pathophysiologic relevance and prognostic value of QT dispersion].

Authors:  M Zabel; S H Hohnloser
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-12

4.  QT dispersion in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: the impact of disease activity.

Authors:  Javad Kojuri; Mohammad Ali Nazarinia; Mohammad Ghahartars; Yadollah Mahmoody; Gholam reza Rezaian; Lida Liaghat
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  QT dispersion increases in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Bunyamin Yavuz; Enver Atalar; Omer Karadag; Erol Tulumen; Necla Ozer; Ali Akdogan; Ihsan Ertenli; Sedat Kiraz; Meral Calguneri; Ferhan Ozmen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Effect of heart rate on ventricular repolarization in healthy individuals applying vectorcardiographic T vector and T vector loop analysis.

Authors:  Farzad Vahedi; Michael F Haney; Steen M Jensen; Ulf Näslund; Lennart Bergfeldt
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  Dynamics of ventricular repolarization in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy versus healthy subjects.

Authors:  Jose Luis Alonso; Pablo Martínez; Montserrat Vallverdú; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Maria Vittoria Pitzalis; Antoni Bayés Genís; Juan Cinca; Paolo Rizzon; Pere Caminal; Wojciech Zareba; Antoni Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Improving the reproducibility of QT dispersion measures.

Authors:  K Lund; J S Perkiömäki; C Brohet; M Zaïdi; H Elming; C T Pedersen; H V Huikuri; H Nygaard; A K Pedersen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Population of computational rabbit-specific ventricular action potential models for investigating sources of variability in cellular repolarisation.

Authors:  Philip Gemmell; Kevin Burrage; Blanca Rodriguez; T Alexander Quinn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.