Literature DB >> 9358358

The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review.

D Schwartz-Arad1, G Chaushu.   

Abstract

A waiting period of 12 months or longer to allow total socket healing used to be accepted protocol for placing dental implants. More than 15 years of research and clinical practice were needed for the concept of immediate endossceous implantation into fresh extraction sites to be accepted. Today the dilemma is no longer when, but which, protocol to follow. The diverse recommendations found in the literature leave the practitioner confused as to the methodology of choice. The conclusions drawn after reviewing the relevant literature on immediate dental implantation are: 1) implants placed into fresh extraction sockets have a high rate of survival, ranging between 93.9% to 100%; 2) implants must be placed 3 to 5 mm beyond the apex in order to gain a maximal degree of stability; 3) implants should be placed as close as possible to the alveolar crest level (0 to 3 mm); 4) there is no consensus regarding the need for gap filling and the best grafting material; 5) the use of membrane does not imply better results-on the contrary, membrane exposure may carry complications in its wake; and 6) the absolute need for primary closure remains to be established.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9358358     DOI: 10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  26 in total

1.  Survival of Implants in Immediate Extraction Sockets of Anterior Teeth: Early Clinical Results.

Authors:  Mohammad Sabir; Mohammad Nazish Alam
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation protocols for immediate implants.

Authors:  M Viswambaran; N Thiruvalluvan
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2013-09-24

3.  Custom anatomic healing abutments.

Authors:  Vinayak S Gowda; Dhruv Anand; Manoj Kumar Sundar; Agnelo Michael Reveredo; Shilpa Shetty
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

4.  Immediate-loading post extractive implants: indications, advantages and limits.

Authors:  G Mampieri; L Ottria; A Barlattani
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2009-02-01

5.  Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in split-crest and immediate implant placement.

Authors:  Roberto Crespi; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

6.  Clinical evaluation of immediate implants using different types of bone augmentation materials.

Authors:  M Viswambaran; Vimal Arora; R C Tripathi; R K Dhiman
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2012-09-13

7.  A novel approach for restoration of hemisected mandibular first molar with immediately loaded single piece BCS implant: A case report.

Authors:  Mahender Singh; Ranmeet Batra; Debdutta Das; Shweta Verma; Munish Goel
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2017-01-28

8.  Immediate non-submerged implants with laser-microtextured collar placed in the inter-radicular septum of mandibular molar extraction sockets associated to GBR: Results at 3-year.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Dario Di Nardo; Gianni Di Giorgio; Gabriele Miccoli; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-04-01

9.  Evaluation of implants placed immediately or delayed into extraction sites.

Authors:  U S Pal; Neeraj Kumar Dhiman; Geeta Singh; R K Singh; Shadab Mohammad; Laxman R Malkunje
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01

10.  Is The Periapical lesion a Risk For Periimplantitis? (A review).

Authors:  Z Rezaei Esfahrood; M Kadkhodazadeh; R Amid; Ar Rokn
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2012-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.