Literature DB >> 9358208

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two nifedipine products in capsule form following single oral administration in healthy volunteers.

N M Rawashdeh1, A H Battah, Y M Irshaid, M K al-Qato.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, Cmax, Tmax, and t1/2) of nifedipine following single oral administration of a 10 mg capsule of test product were compared to those of the same amount of a reference product. The two products in capsule form were administered according to a randomized two-way crossover design in 22 healthy male volunteers. Nifedipine plasma concentrations were determined using a rapid, sensitive and precise high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method with ultraviolet (UV) detection at 235 nm. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean value of the ratio [Myogard (test product) /Adalat (reference product)] for pharmacokinetic parameters were 0.90-1.08, 0.80-1.07, and 0.93-1.12 for AUC0-->infinity, Cmax and t1/2, respectively. In each case, values were within the acceptable bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. Distribution free point estimate for the difference in expected medians of Tmax of the two products (Myogard-Adalat) was 0.00 h with a 90% confidence interval of 0.00-0.13 which is greater than the accepted bioequivalence of +/- 0.12. The kinetic parameters were comparable to those reported for nifedipine, and no statistically significant differences were found in any of them when comparing the two products by analysis of variance (ANOVA) on log-transformed data. Thus, the two products could be considered bioequivalent regarding absorption rate (Cmax and Tmax), extent of absorption (Cmax and AUC) and elimination (t1/2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9358208     DOI: 10.1007/BF03189816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  8 in total

1.  Presentation of results from bioequivalence studies.

Authors:  R Sauter; V W Steinijans; E Diletti; A Böhm; H U Schulz
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1992-07

Review 2.  Striving for standards in bioequivalence assessment: a review.

Authors:  H U Schulz; V W Steinijans
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1991-08

Review 3.  Nifedipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and related cardiovascular disorders.

Authors:  E M Sorkin; S P Clissold; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nifedipine in patients at steady state.

Authors:  L M Gutierrez; L J Lesko; R Whipps; N Carliner; M Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.126

5.  PKCALC: a BASIC interactive computer program for statistical and pharmacokinetic analysis of data.

Authors:  R C Shumaker
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.518

6.  Variability in nifedipine pharmacokinetics and dynamics: a new oxidation polymorphism in man.

Authors:  C H Kleinbloesem; P van Brummelen; H Faber; M Danhof; N P Vermeulen; D D Breimer
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1984-11-15       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two commercial oral nifedipine products.

Authors:  O Shaheen; S Zmeili; Y al-Qussuois; T Arafat; H Mouti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1991-09

8.  Nifedipine kinetics and bioavailability after single intravenous and oral doses in normal subjects.

Authors:  T S Foster; S R Hamann; V R Richards; P J Bryant; D A Graves; R G McAllister
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.126

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.