Literature DB >> 9357747

Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study.

M B Chabanski1, D G Gillam, J S Bulman, H N Newman.   

Abstract

The prevalence of tooth sensitivity [Cervical Dentine Sensitivity (CDS)] in adult populations indicates that 8-35% of subjects reported CDS depending on the population studied and the methodology used. Few studies, however, have reported on the prevalence of CDS in periodontal patients. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence, severity and distribution of CDS in patients referred for specialist periodontal diagnosis. Fifty-one patients [27 male, 24 female; mean age 48.5 years (standard deviation 11.63)] who gave their informed written consent were clinically evaluated for CDS using recognized methods of assessment, namely Yeaple probe, cold air blast and subjective evaluation. Other clinical variables (e.g. plaque and recession scores) were also recorded at this visit. Regression analysis and correlation coefficients were used to determine the relationship between the clinical variables. The results demonstrated a prevalence of CDS ranging between 72.5 and 98% of patients, with no significant gender difference. Results for the distribution of tooth types showed that molar teeth were mainly affected, followed by left canines and premolars. No correlation was noted between plaque, recession, response to tactile or thermal stimulation. Pain response from tactile and thermal stimulation showed no significant difference between tooth surfaces. Cold stimulation was perceived to be the dominant pain-producing stimulus as had been previously reported. The results of this investigation support those from another study, which found the prevalence of CDS to be higher in periodontal patients than has been reported elsewhere. This finding would suggest that previous periodontal treatment and/or periodontal disease may play a role in the aetiology of CDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9357747     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00552.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  18 in total

Review 1.  Laser phototherapy in the treatment of periodontal disease. A review.

Authors:  Carlos de Paula Eduardo; Patricia Moreira de Freitas; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Ana Cecília Corrêa Aranha; Karen Müller Ramalho; Alyne Simões; Marina Stella Bello-Silva; Jan Tunér
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of gingival displacement methods in terms of periodontal health at crown restorations produced by digital scan: 1-year clinical follow-up.

Authors:  Beyza Ünalan Değirmenci; Beyza Karadağ Naldemir; Alperen Değirmenci
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Nano/micro fluorhydroxyapatite crystal pastes in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Sahar T Taha; Hua Han; Sywe-Ren Chang; Iva Sovadinova; Kenichi Kuroda; Richard M Langford; Brian H Clarkson
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Treating dentin hypersensitivity: therapeutic choices made by dentists of the northwest PRECEDENT network.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; John C Wataha; Lingmei Zhou; Walter Manning; Michael Trantow; Meishan M Bettendorf; Lisa J Heaton; Joel Berg
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; John C Wataha; Lisa J Heaton; Marilynn Rothen; Martin Sobieraj; JoAnna Scott; Joel Berg
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Desensitizing Agent Reduces Dentin Hypersensitivity During Ultrasonic Scaling: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Tomonari Suda; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Toshiharu Akiyama; Takuya Takano; Misa Gokyu; Takeaki Sudo; Thatawee Khemwong; Yuichi Izumi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 7.  How valid and applicable are current diagnostic criteria and assessment methods for dentin hypersensitivity? An overview.

Authors:  Christian R Gernhardt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Maxillary rehabilitation of periodontally compromised patients with extensive one-piece fixed prostheses supported by natural teeth: a retrospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Alexander Heschl; Michael Haas; Josef Haas; Michael Payer; Walther Wegscheider; Raoul Polansky
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 9.  Epidemiology of dentin hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Christian H Splieth; Aikaterini Tachou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Prevalence of dentinal hypersensitivity and study of associated factors: a cross-sectional study based on the general dental population of Davangere, Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Ryana Kour Haneet; Laxman Kharidi Vandana
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.607

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.