Literature DB >> 9356106

The effect of epidural saline injection on analgesic level during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia assessed clinically and myelographically.

T Takiguchi1, T Okano, H Egawa, Y Okubo, K Saito, T Kitajima.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: An epidural injection of physiological saline solution after spinal anesthesia may produce a higher level of analgesia than spinal anesthesia alone because of a volume effect. The purpose of this study was to clarify the volume effect caused by epidural injection of saline after spinal anesthesia. Twenty patients undergoing combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for elective surgery whose analgesic levels did not reach the surgical regions 10 min after spinal anesthesia at the L4-5 interspace were randomly assigned to two groups. The control group (n = 10) received no epidural saline injection. The saline group (n = 10) received 10 mL of saline through an epidural catheter at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace 10 min after spinal anesthesia. In the saline group, the levels of analgesia 15 and 20 min after spinal anesthesia were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Next, we examined the volume effect of epidural injection of saline with myelography using two adult volunteers. In both volunteers, the upper level of the contrast medium, which was injected in the lumbar subarachnoid space, began to increase concurrently with lumbar epidural injection of saline, reaching from L3 to L1 and from L2 to T12. The diameter of the subarachnoid space diminished to less than 25% after injection of saline. We conclude that lumbar epidural injection of saline increases the analgesic level 10 min after spinal anesthesia, probably because of a volume effect. IMPLICATIONS: In this study, using surgical patients and volunteers, we determined that a lumbar epidural injection of physiological saline solution 10 min after spinal anesthesia produces a higher analgesic level than spinal anesthesia alone because of a volume effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9356106     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199711000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  Epidural volume extension technique in high risk obstetric patients - Case series.

Authors:  Y Smitha; C P Naveen Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Anesthetic management of a pediatric patient with severe Williams-Campbell syndrome undergoing surgery for giant ovarian tumor.

Authors:  Satoshi Toyama; Fumimaro Hatori; Ayako Shimizu; Toshio Takagi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Combined spinal epidural and epidural volume extension: Interaction of patient position and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Anil Kumar; Gautam Girotra; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10

4.  Epidural volume extension: A novel technique and its efficacy in high risk cases.

Authors:  Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari; Rajeev Ratan Singh; Rudra Pratap Anupam; S Ganguly; Gaurav Singh Tomar
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2012 Jul-Dec

5.  Epidural Volume Extension with Saline in Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Hip Surgeries Using Low Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine.

Authors:  Rajiv Singh Bhandari; Rohan Bhatia; Sanjay Agrawal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

6.  ED50 of intrathecal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery with and without epidural volume extension with normal saline: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  M Lv; P Zhang; Z Wang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Minimum effective volume of normal saline for epidural volume extension.

Authors:  Asha Tyagi; Surendra Kumar; Rashmi Salhotra; Ashok Kumar Sethi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.