Literature DB >> 9356015

Prediction of IDDM in the general population: strategies based on combinations of autoantibody markers.

P J Bingley1, E Bonifacio, A J Williams, S Genovese, G F Bottazzo, E A Gale.   

Abstract

Strategies for assessing risk of progression to IDDM, based on single and combined autoantibody measurement, were evaluated in 2,855 schoolchildren (median age 11.4 years) and 256 children with newly diagnosed IDDM (median age 10.2 years), recruited to a population-based study in the Oxford region. In 256 children with IDDM, levels of antibodies > or =97.5th centile of the schoolchild population were found in 225 (88%) for islet cell antibodies (ICAs), in 190 (74%) for antibodies to GAD, in 193 (75%) for antibodies to protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 (IA-2), and in 177 (69%) for autoantibodies to insulin (IAAs). Estimates of risk of progression to IDDM within 10 years, derived by comparing the distribution of antibody markers in the two populations (schoolchildren and children with IDDM), were 6.7% (ICAs), 6.6% (GAD antibodies), 5.6% (IA-2 antibodies), and 4.8% (IAAs) for schoolchildren with levels above the 97.5th centile, increasing to 20, 23, 24, and 11%, respectively, for antibody levels >99.5th centile. Most children with IDDM had multiple antibody markers, and 89% of those diagnosed over age 10 years had > or =2 antibodies above the 97.5th centile, as compared against 0.7% of schoolchildren, in whom this combination gave a 27% 10-year estimated risk of IDDM. Risk increased but sensitivity fell as combined antibody thresholds were raised, or the number of antibodies above the threshold was increased. Strategies based on detection of > or =2 antibodies with primary testing for GAD and IA-2 antibodies and second line testing for ICAs and/or IAAs were evaluated. Detection of at least two markers selected from GAD antibodies > or =97.5th centile and/or IA-2 antibodies > or =99.5th centile and/or ICAs > or =97.5th centile identified 0.25% of schoolchildren and 83% of children with newly diagnosed IDDM, with an estimated risk of 71% (95% CI 57-91). Although confirmation from prospective studies is still needed, this analysis suggests that antibody combinations can predict diabetes in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9356015     DOI: 10.2337/diab.46.11.1701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  104 in total

1.  Selecting culprits in type 1 diabetes beta-cell killing.

Authors:  A Lernmark
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Autoantibodies as predictors of disease.

Authors:  D Leslie; P Lipsky; A L Notkins
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Maternal age and risk of type 1 diabetes in children. Flawed analysis invalidates conclusions.

Authors:  G Byrnes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-16

4.  Autoimmune type 1 diabetes: resolved and unresolved issues.

Authors:  A L Notkins; A Lernmark
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Mapping of novel autoreactive epitopes of the diabetes-associated autoantigen IA-2.

Authors:  J Seissler; M Schott; N G Morgenthaler; W A Scherbaum
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Prospects for the prevention and reversal of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Nikolai Petrovsky; Diego Silva; Desmond A Schatz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Immunoglobulin subclass profiles of anti-idiotypic antibodies to GAD65Ab differ between type 1 diabetes patients and healthy individuals.

Authors:  S Oak; J Radtke; C Törn; M Landin-Olsson; C S Hampe
Journal:  Scand J Immunol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.487

Review 8.  Molecular aspects of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  M A Kelly; M L Rayner; C H Mijovic; A H Barnett
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2003-02

9.  Biomarkers for type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Sharad Purohit; Jin-Xiong She
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2008-02-29

10.  Insulin resistance is a risk factor for progression to type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S Fourlanos; P Narendran; G B Byrnes; P G Colman; L C Harrison
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.