Literature DB >> 9355827

Complications and risks of living donor nephrectomy.

E M Johnson1, M J Remucal, K J Gillingham, R A Dahms, J S Najarian, A J Matas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short- and long-term patient and graft survival rates are better for living donor (vs. cadaver) kidney transplant recipients. However, donor nephrectomy is associated with at least some morbidity and mortality. We have previously estimated the mortality of living donor nephrectomy to be 0.03%. In our present study, to determine associated perioperative morbidity, we reviewed donor nephrectomies performed at our institution from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1995.
METHODS: The records of 871 donors were complete and available for review. Of these donors, 380 (44%) were male and 491 (56%) were female. The mean age at the time of donation was 38 years (range: 17-74 years), and mean postoperative stay was 4.9 days (range: 2-14 days).
RESULTS: We noted two (0.2%) major complications: femoral nerve compression with resulting weakness, and a retained sponge that required reexploration. We noted 86 minor complications in 69 (8%) donors: 22 (2.4%) suspected wound infections (only 1 wound was opened), 13 (1.5%) pneumothoraces (6 required intervention, 7 resolved spontaneously), 11 (1.3%) unexplained fevers, 8 (0.9%) instances of operative blood loss > or = 750 ml (not associated with other complications), 8 (0.9%) pneumonias (all of which resolved quickly with antibiotics alone), 5 (0.6%) wound hematomas or seromas (none were opened), 4 (0.5%) phlebitic intravenous sites, 3 (0.3%) urinary tract infections, 3 (0.3%) readmissions (2 for pain control and 1 for mild confusion that resolved with discontinuation of narcotics), 3 (0.3%) cases of atelectasis, 2 (0.2%) corneal abrasions, 1 (0.1%) subacute epididymitis, 1 (0.1%) Clostridium difficile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy. At our institution, no donor died or required ventilation or intensive care. We noted no myocardial infarctions, deep wound infections, or reexplorations for bleeding. Analysis, by logistic regression, identified these significant risk factors for perioperative complications: male gender (vs. female, P<0.001), pleural entry (vs. no pleural entry, P<0.004), and weight > or = 100 kg (vs. < 100 kg, P<0.02). Similar analysis identified these significant risk factors for postoperative stay > 5 days: operative duration > or = 4 hr (vs. < 4 hr, P<0.001) and age > or = 50 years (vs. < 50 years, P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Living donor nephrectomy can be done with little major morbidity. The risks of nephrectomy must be balanced against the better outcome for recipients of living donor transplants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9355827     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199710270-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  31 in total

1.  It's only love? Some pitfalls in emotionally related organ donation.

Authors:  N Biller-Andorno; H Schauenburg
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Li-Ming Su; Lloyd E Ratner; Robert A Montgomery; Thomas W Jarrett; Bruce J Trock; Vladimir Sinkov; Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Louis R Kavoussi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  The living kidney donor evaluation: focus on renal issues.

Authors:  Ajay Kher; Didier A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Very low but stable glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: is the concept of "chronic kidney disease" applicable to kidney donors?

Authors:  Ryo Kido; Yugo Shibagaki; Kazuhiro Iwadoh; Ichiro Nakajima; Shohei Fuchinoue; Toshiro Fujita; Satoshi Teraoka
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques.

Authors:  Robin Ruszat; Tullio Sulser; Michael Dickenmann; Thomas Wolff; Lorenz Gürke; Thomas Eugster; Igor Langer; Peter Vogelbach; Jürg Steiger; Thomas C Gasser; Christian G Stief; Alexander Bachmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Change in renal function following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy using 99 mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid scan.

Authors:  Hyuk Jin Cho; Sae Woong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; Su Jin Kim; Sung Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Tae-Kon Hwang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Psychosocial evaluation of candidates for living related kidney donation.

Authors:  Kimberly Sterner; Nataliya Zelikovsky; Cynthia Green; Bernard S Kaplan
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  Gender imbalance in living organ donation.

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

9.  Kidney organ donation: developing family practice initiatives to reverse inertia.

Authors:  Emmanouil K Symvoulakis; Emilia Stavroulaki; Myfanwy Morgan; Roger Jones
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Comparative and prospective analysis of three different approaches for live-donor nephrectomy.

Authors:  Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Francisco T Dénes; William Carlos Nahas; Fabiano A Simões; José Roberto Colombo; Affonso C Piovesan; José L Chambô; Sami Arap; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.