Literature DB >> 9355136

Assessment and treatment selection for "revolving door" inpatients with schizophrenia.

P Weiden1, W Glazer.   

Abstract

GOALS: The goals of this study are 1) to determine causes and patterns of relapse for a cohort of "revolving door" schizophrenia inpatients, and 2) to assess the feasibility of starting a new psychopharmacologic intervention before discharge, either depot therapy or an atypical antipsychotic.
METHODS: Consecutive admissions to an acute inpatient unit in New York City were screened for "revolving door" criteria. Patients had to have a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and have either 1) two hospitalizations in the last year, or 2) three hospitalizations in the last three years. Patients were then assessed for probable causes of relapse for the index and prior two hospitalizations. Treatment selection, based on this information, was trichotomized to: 1) oral conventional antipsychotic, 2) depot conventional antipsychotic (either haloperidol or fluphenazine decanoate), or 3) atypical antipsychotic (either risperidone or clozapine).
RESULTS: Sixty-three out of 131 screened admissions met the above revolving door criteria. They were indeed "revolving", having an average of 1.3 hospitalizations per year over the last 3 years and were only out of the hospital for five months (median) before index admission. The treatment selection process was hampered by lack of information about events leading to relapse, and by the lack of outpatient participation in the medication selection process. Of the 50 patients with complete histories about precipitants for the index episode, the most common reason for rehospitalization was judged to be medication noncompliance (n = 25; 50%), followed by medication nonresponse (n = 13; 26%). Not surprisingly, medication recommendations were closely linked to the assessed reason for relapse (depot therapy [n = 27; 49%] with medication noncompliance; atypical antipsychotic [n = 20; 37%] with medication nonresponse [X2 = 26.9, p < .001]). These two recommendations were implemented before discharge for about one-half of the cases. Patient refusal was a relatively greater problem for depot recommendation while constraints in the outpatient environment were more problematic for patients recommended for atypical antipsychotics.
CONCLUSIONS: Medication noncompliance and medication nonresponse, in that order, were judged to be the most common causes of relapse for "revolving door" inpatients. Both depot therapy and atypical antipsychotics were commonly recommended and ultimately accepted by about 2/3rds of patients. Choice between depot and atypical was driven by the assessed cause of relapse. In summary, it seems possible to identify "revolving door" inpatients, and to target specific medication interventions within the time frame of an acute inpatient admission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9355136     DOI: 10.1023/a:1025499131905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatr Q        ISSN: 0033-2720


  15 in total

1.  Challenges in state mental health policy and administration.

Authors:  D Mechanic; R C Surles
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Further observations on the duration of depot neuroleptic maintenance therapy in schizophrenia.

Authors:  D A Johnson
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 9.319

Review 3.  The current unsatisfactory state of relapse prevention in schizophrenic psychoses--suggestions for improvement.

Authors:  W Kissling
Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.592

4.  Trends in state and county mental hospitals in the U.S. from 1970 to 1992.

Authors:  M J Witkin; J Atay; R W Manderscheid
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Medication compliance among the seriously mentally ill in a public mental health system.

Authors:  C Nageotte; G Sullivan; N Duan; P L Camp
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  A pharmacoeconomic model of outpatient antipsychotic therapy in "revolving door" schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  W M Glazer; L Ereshefsky
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 7.  Atypical antipsychotic drugs and long-term outcome in schizophrenia.

Authors:  P Weiden; R Aquila; J Standard
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.384

8.  Postdischarge medication compliance of inpatients converted from an oral to a depot neuroleptic regimen.

Authors:  P Weiden; B Rapkin; A Zygmunt; T Mott; D Goldman; A Frances
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Results from the National Comorbidity Survey.

Authors:  R C Kessler; K A McGonagle; S Zhao; C B Nelson; M Hughes; S Eshleman; H U Wittchen; K S Kendler
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1994-01

10.  CMHS data highlights on: availability of psychiatric beds, United States: selected years, 1970-1990.

Authors:  R W Redick; M J Witkin; J E Atay; R W Manderscheid
Journal:  Ment Health Stat Note       Date:  1994-08
View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of long-acting risperidone: results and validity of cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  Alan Haycox
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Long-acting risperidone compared with oral olanzapine and haloperidol depot in schizophrenia: a Belgian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Diana De Graeve; Ann Smet; Angelika Mehnert; Sue Caleo; Houda Miadi-Fargier; Guillermo Jasso Mosqueda; Damien Lecompte; Joseph Peuskens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Costs and effects of long-acting risperidone compared with oral atypical and conventional depot formulations in Germany.

Authors:  Gerd Laux; Bart Heeg; Ben A van Hout; Angelika Mehnert
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The revolving door phenomenon in psychiatry: comparing low-frequency and high-frequency users of psychiatric inpatient services in a developing country.

Authors:  Ulla A Botha; Liezl Koen; John A Joska; John S Parker; Neil Horn; Linda M Hering; Piet P Oosthuizen
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Correlates of Negative Attitudes towards Medication in People with Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lucie Kondrátová; Daniel König; Karolína Mladá; Petr Winkler
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  Defining and assessing adherence to oral antipsychotics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Dawn I Velligan; Yui-Wing Francis Lam; David C Glahn; Jennifer A Barrett; Natalie J Maples; Larry Ereshefsky; Alexander L Miller
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  A review of pharmacologic strategies for switching to atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Prakash S Masand
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2005

8.  Revolving-door patients in a public psychiatric hospital in Israel: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Igor Oyffe; Rena Kurs; Marc Gelkopf; Yuval Melamed; Avi Bleich
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Assessing the efficacy of a modified assertive community-based treatment programme in a developing country.

Authors:  Ulla A Botha; Liezl Koen; John A Joska; Linda M Hering; Piet P Oosthuizen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.630

10.  Adolescent attitudes toward psychiatric medication: the utility of the Drug Attitude Inventory.

Authors:  Lisa Townsend; Jerry Floersch; Robert L Findling
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.