BACKGROUND: The value of screening donors for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) for the prevention of posttransfusion hepatitis has declined markedly. However, anti-HBc screening may still be useful as a surrogate marker for the window period (WP) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: First, the relationship between anti-HBc reactivity and HIV-1 WP infections was examined among 225 donors who had seroconverted to anti-HIV-1 positivity between 1987 and 1990. In addition, data from 1654 HIV-1 seropositive donors were analyzed to characterize the relationship among anti-HBc reactivity, donor demographics, and HIV-1-related risk factors. The yield and cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc for HIV-1 prevention were then projected on the basis of a published decision analysis model. RESULTS: Forty (18%) of 225 HIV-1-seroconverting donors tested anti-HBc-reactive on the donation preceding anti-HIV-1 seroconversion; in contrast, 341 (34%) of 1014 HIV-1-seropositive donors interviewed tested anti-HBc-reactive (chi-square test; p < 0.001). Anti-HBc reactivity was more common among HIV-1-seropositive donors reporting male-to-male sexual contact (169/360, 47%) and injection drug use (44/83, 53%) than among those with heterosexual contacts known to be HIV-1-positive (31/190, 16%) or transfusion exposure (3/21, 14%) or among females with no identified risk factors (21/124, 17%). The estimates of 18 to 34 percent sensitivity for anti-HBc in detecting HIV-1 WP donations and a current rate of 1 in 676,000 HIV-1 WP donations (after p24 antigen screening) suggest that continued use of anti-HBc screening could result in the transfusion of 5 to 12 fewer HIV-1-infected units per year in the United States, which would add 19 to 48 quality-adjusted years of life for the 3.5 million annual transfusion recipients at a cost of $992,020 to $2,345,000 per quality-adjusted life-year saved. CONCLUSION: The low yield and very poor cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc screening indicate that this test is not an effective screening test for HIV-1 WP donations.
BACKGROUND: The value of screening donors for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) for the prevention of posttransfusion hepatitis has declined markedly. However, anti-HBc screening may still be useful as a surrogate marker for the window period (WP) of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: First, the relationship between anti-HBc reactivity and HIV-1 WP infections was examined among 225 donors who had seroconverted to anti-HIV-1 positivity between 1987 and 1990. In addition, data from 1654 HIV-1 seropositive donors were analyzed to characterize the relationship among anti-HBc reactivity, donor demographics, and HIV-1-related risk factors. The yield and cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc for HIV-1 prevention were then projected on the basis of a published decision analysis model. RESULTS: Forty (18%) of 225 HIV-1-seroconverting donors tested anti-HBc-reactive on the donation preceding anti-HIV-1 seroconversion; in contrast, 341 (34%) of 1014 HIV-1-seropositive donors interviewed tested anti-HBc-reactive (chi-square test; p < 0.001). Anti-HBc reactivity was more common among HIV-1-seropositive donors reporting male-to-male sexual contact (169/360, 47%) and injection drug use (44/83, 53%) than among those with heterosexual contacts known to be HIV-1-positive (31/190, 16%) or transfusion exposure (3/21, 14%) or among females with no identified risk factors (21/124, 17%). The estimates of 18 to 34 percent sensitivity for anti-HBc in detecting HIV-1 WP donations and a current rate of 1 in 676,000 HIV-1 WP donations (after p24 antigen screening) suggest that continued use of anti-HBc screening could result in the transfusion of 5 to 12 fewer HIV-1-infected units per year in the United States, which would add 19 to 48 quality-adjusted years of life for the 3.5 million annual transfusion recipients at a cost of $992,020 to $2,345,000 per quality-adjusted life-year saved. CONCLUSION: The low yield and very poor cost-effectiveness of anti-HBc screening indicate that this test is not an effective screening test for HIV-1 WP donations.
Authors: Shyoko Honiden; Vandana Sundaram; Robert F Nease; Mark Holodniy; Laura C Lazzeroni; Andrew Zolopa; Douglas K Owens Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.147