Literature DB >> 9354058

Intraocular pressure in 528 university students: effect of refractive error.

M C Puell-Marín1, M Romero-Martín, M Domínguez-Carmona.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Very few studies measuring the intraocular pressure (IOP) in students are available. Recognizing the higher prevalence of myopia among students, IOP was analyzed in 528 university students according to age, gender, and refractive error.
METHODS: The IOP was measured in 1,056 eyes with the Keeler Pulsair noncontact tonometer. The refractive error was determined with an autorefractometer (Shin-Nippon brand, model QR-007).
RESULTS: The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed no significant influence of age and gender on students' IOP (mean IOP, 15.77 +/- 2.67 mmHg). Refractive error did not significantly influence the mean of IOP (ANOVA) in the different categories: (a) severe myopia, (b) medium myopia, (c) emmetropia and mild ametropia, and (d) hypermetropia. The chi 2 test revealed significant differences, as a result of age, between the eyes with IOP < 21 mmHg or > or = 21 mmHg (6.3%). Nevertheless, there was no significant IOP difference as a result of gender or refractive error among eyes with normal IOPs and eyes with IOP above 20 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: Among university students, intraocular pressure is not influenced by age, gender, or refractive status. Likewise, except for age, there is no significant correlation between any of the other variables and the normal range of IOP. After the age of 25 years, there is a slight increase in the number of eyes with an IOP above 20 mmHg.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9354058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc        ISSN: 0003-0244


  5 in total

1.  Intraocular pressure, ethnicity, and refractive error.

Authors:  Ruth E Manny; G Lynn Mitchell; Susan A Cotter; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Robert N Kleinstein; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Intraocular pressure and central corneal thickness in the COMET cohort.

Authors:  Karen D Fern; Ruth E Manny; Jane Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Katherine Weise; Wendy Marsh-Tootle
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Pharmaceutical intervention for myopia control.

Authors:  Prema Ganesan; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12-01

4.  cAMP level modulates scleral collagen remodeling, a critical step in the development of myopia.

Authors:  Yijin Tao; Miaozhen Pan; Shufeng Liu; Fang Fang; Runxia Lu; Chanyi Lu; Min Zheng; Jianhong An; Hongjia Xu; Fuxin Zhao; Jiang-Fan Chen; Jia Qu; Xiangtian Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Distribution and associations of intraocular pressure in 7- and 12-year-old Chinese children: The Anyang Childhood Eye Study.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Shi-Ming Li; Xiao-Lei Wang; Meng-Tian Kang; Luo-Ru Liu; He Li; Shi-Fei Wei; An-Ran Ran; Siyan Zhan; Ravi Thomas; Ningli Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.