Literature DB >> 9353796

Motor and premotor mechanisms of licking.

J B Travers1, L A Dinardo, H Karimnamazi.   

Abstract

The location, organization and anatomical connections of a central pattern generator (CPG) for licking are discussed. Anatomical and physiological studies suggest a brainstem location distributed within several subdivisions of the medullary reticular formation (RF). The involvement of widespread RF regions is evident from brainstem recording experiments in awake freely moving preparations and studies employing electrical stimulation of the frontal cortex to produce ororhythmic activity. The complex multifunctional properties of RF neurons producing licking are indicated by their activity during licking, swallowing and the rejection of an aversive gustatory stimulus. Anatomical studies place descending inputs to a brainstem CPG for licking to widely distributed areas of both the medial and lateral RF. In contrast, most projections originating from brainstem orosensory nuclei terminate primarily within the lateral RF. Because many pre-oromotor neurons appear concentrated largely in the intermediate zone of the RF (IRt), it is hypothesized that neurons from both lateral and medial sites converge within the IRt to control oromotor function.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353796     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(96)00045-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  86 in total

1.  Distribution of fos-like immunoreactivity in the medullary reticular formation of the rat after gustatory elicited ingestion and rejection behaviors.

Authors:  L A DiNardo; J B Travers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Intrinsic membrane properties of pre-oromotor neurons in the intermediate zone of the medullary reticular formation.

Authors:  S Venugopal; J A Boulant; Z Chen; J B Travers
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Reduced sweet and fatty fluid intake after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in rats is dependent on experience without change in stimulus motivational potency.

Authors:  Clare M Mathes; Ryan A Bohnenkamp; Carel W le Roux; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  The Behavioral Relevance of Cortical Neural Ensemble Responses Emerges Suddenly.

Authors:  Brian F Sadacca; Narendra Mukherjee; Tony Vladusich; Jennifer X Li; Donald B Katz; Paul Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Brainstem Oscillator for Whisking and the Case for Breathing as the Master Clock for Orofacial Motor Actions.

Authors:  David Kleinfeld; Jeffrey D Moore; Fan Wang; Martin Deschênes
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 6.  Neural circuits underlying thirst and fluid homeostasis.

Authors:  Christopher A Zimmerman; David E Leib; Zachary A Knight
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  A low-cost solution to measure mouse licking in an electrophysiological setup with a standard analog-to-digital converter.

Authors:  Abdallah Hayar; Jeri L Bryant; John D Boughter; Detlef H Heck
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  A computational model for motor pattern switching between taste-induced ingestion and rejection oromotor behaviors.

Authors:  Sharmila Venugopal; Joseph B Travers; David H Terman
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.621

9.  Impact of precisely-timed inhibition of gustatory cortex on taste behavior depends on single-trial ensemble dynamics.

Authors:  Narendra Mukherjee; Joseph Wachutka; Donald B Katz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Effects of Tongue Force Training on Bulbar Motor Function in the Female SOD1-G93A Rat Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

Authors:  Delin Ma; Jeffrey M Shuler; Aishwarya Kumar; Quincy R Stanford; Sudheer Tungtur; Hiroshi Nishimune; John A Stanford
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 3.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.