Literature DB >> 9353477

In-phase and out-of-phase MR imaging of bone marrow: prediction of neoplasia based on the detection of coexistent fat and water.

D G Disler1, T R McCauley, L M Ratner, C D Kesack, J A Cooper.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if gradient-echo MR imaging with TEs selected with fat and water in phase and out of phase can help predict the likelihood of neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions in bone marrow. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients with 31 suspected bone marrow lesions underwent MR imaging, including two spoiled gradient-echo sequences identical in all parameters except TE, which was chosen such that fat and water were either in phase or out of phase. Relative ratios of the abnormal bone marrow signal intensity and a control site on the in-phase and out-of-phase images were expressed. The images were also assessed independently by two reviewers who were unaware of the patients' identities and clinical histories. Reviewers assessed decreased marrow signal intensity relative to control sites on the out-of-phase and in-phase images. Pathologic confirmation was obtained in 16 patients (17 lesions); the remainder of patients had either established diagnoses or determination of benignity based on stability of findings at 1 year. Relative ratios were compared with the Student's t test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the reviewers' scores were evaluated with ROC curve analysis.
RESULTS: The relative signal-intensity ratios were 1.03 +/- 0.13 for the neoplastic group and 0.62 +/- 0.13 for the nonneoplastic group (p < .0001). ROC curve analysis of the signal-intensity ratios showed a z-score of .99. A ratio cutoff value of 0.81 resulted in a 95% sensitivity and a 95% specificity for detection of neoplasm. Both reviewers achieved 100% sensitivity and 94-100% specificity for detection of neoplasms.
CONCLUSION: In-phase and out-of-phase gradient-echo MR imaging of bone marrow signal-intensity abnormalities can help predict the likelihood of neoplastic or nonneoplastic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9353477     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.169.5.9353477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  44 in total

Review 1.  Invisible fat on CT: making it visible by MRI.

Authors:  Emre Ünal; Ali Devrim Karaosmanoğlu; Deniz Akata; Mustafa Nasuh Özmen; Muşturay Karçaaltıncaba
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal marrow: Basic understanding of the normal marrow pattern and its variant.

Authors:  Mohamed Ragab Nouh; Ahmed Fathi Eid
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

3.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MRI for differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral lesions.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Michael Meier-Schroers; Daniel Lloyd Kuetting; Andreas Feißt; Jürgen Gieseke; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow in oncology, Part 1.

Authors:  Sinchun Hwang; David M Panicek
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MR imaging for differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of the spine.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Andreas Feißt; Christoph Hans-Jürgen Endler; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Peter Johannes Wagenhäuser; Frank Träber; Hans Heinz Schild; Guido Matthias Kukuk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Chemical shift MRI can aid in the diagnosis of indeterminate skeletal lesions of the spine.

Authors:  H Douis; A M Davies; L Jeys; P Sian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow.

Authors:  Niels van Vucht; Rodney Santiago; Bianca Lottmann; Ian Pressney; Dorothee Harder; Adnan Sheikh; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Chemical shift imaging with in-phase and opposed-phase sequences at 3 T: what is the optimal threshold, measurement method, and diagnostic accuracy for characterizing marrow signal abnormalities?

Authors:  Neil M Kumar; Shivani Ahlawat; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 9.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Musculoskeletal pitfalls and pseudotumours in the pelvis: a pictorial review for body imagers.

Authors:  S Ghazizadeh; E W Foss; R Didier; A Fung; D M Panicek; F V Coakley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.