C Abel1, M Lendon, D C Gough. 1. Department of Paediatric Urology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the histological change in the upper pole of excised duplex kidneys and assess whether ante-natal diagnosis might predispose to more conservative surgical management of this abnormality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing upper pole hemi-nephroureterectomy for ectopic ureter or ectopic ureterocele between 1980 and 1992 had their histology reviewed and assessed for dysplastic, inflammatory and obstructive change. RESULTS: Segmental scarring and chronic and acute inflammatory change occurred consistently and the degree of inflammation seemed unaffected by antenatal diagnosis. Dysplasia was seen in 70% of patients with ureterocele and in only 30% of those with ectopic ureter. One patient had normal histology. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of reversible histological change in patients with ectopic ureter and ectopic ureterocele who were diagnosed ante-natally. Preservation of the upper pole of the kidney does not seem justified in the light of the histological evidence.
OBJECTIVE: To review the histological change in the upper pole of excised duplex kidneys and assess whether ante-natal diagnosis might predispose to more conservative surgical management of this abnormality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients undergoing upper pole hemi-nephroureterectomy for ectopic ureter or ectopic ureterocele between 1980 and 1992 had their histology reviewed and assessed for dysplastic, inflammatory and obstructive change. RESULTS: Segmental scarring and chronic and acute inflammatory change occurred consistently and the degree of inflammation seemed unaffected by antenatal diagnosis. Dysplasia was seen in 70% of patients with ureterocele and in only 30% of those with ectopic ureter. One patient had normal histology. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of reversible histological change in patients with ectopic ureter and ectopic ureterocele who were diagnosed ante-natally. Preservation of the upper pole of the kidney does not seem justified in the light of the histological evidence.