Literature DB >> 9352631

A model for learning human reaching movements.

A Karniel1, G F Inbar.   

Abstract

Reaching movement is a fast movement towards a given target. The main characteristics of such a movement are straight path and a bell-shaped speed profile. In this work a mathematical model for the control of the human arm during ballistic reaching movements is presented. The model of the arm contains a 2 degrees of freedom planar manipulator, and a Hill-type, non-linear mechanical model of six muscles. The arm model is taken from the literature with minor changes. The nervous system is modeled as an adjustable pattern generator that creates the control signals to the muscles. The control signals in this model are rectangular pulses activated at various amplitudes and timings, that are determined according to the given target. These amplitudes and timings are the parameters that should be related to each target and initial conditions in the work-space. The model of the nervous system consists of an artificial neural net that maps any given target to the parameter space of the pattern generator. In order to train this net, the nervous system model includes a sensitivity model that transforms the error from the arm end-point coordinates to the parameter coordinates. The error is assessed only at the termination of the movement from knowledge of the results. The role of the non-linearity in the muscle model and the performance of the learning scheme are analysed, illustrated in simulations and discussed. The results of the present study demonstrate the central nervous system's (CNS) ability to generate typical reaching movements with a simple feedforward controller that controls only the timing and amplitude of rectangular excitation pulses to the muscles and adjusts these parameters based on knowledge of the results. In this scheme, which is based on the adjustment of only a few parameters instead of the whole trajectory, the dimension of the control problem is reduced significantly. It is shown that the non-linear properties of the muscles are essential to achieve this simple control. This conclusion agrees with the general concept that motor control is the result of an interaction between the nervous system and the musculoskeletal dynamics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9352631     DOI: 10.1007/s004220050378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  10 in total

1.  The acquisition and implementation of the smoothness maximization motion strategy is dependent on spatial accuracy demands.

Authors:  Ronen Sosnik; Tamar Flash; Bjoern Hauptmann; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Performance enhancement for audio-visual speaker identification using dynamic facial muscle model.

Authors:  Vahid Asadpour; Farzad Towhidkhah; Mohammad Mehdi Homayounpour
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mechanical properties of the human hand digits: age-related differences.

Authors:  Jaebum Park; Nemanja Pažin; Jason Friedman; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.063

4.  Computational Models for Neuromuscular Function.

Authors:  Francisco J Valero-Cuevas; Heiko Hoffmann; Manish U Kurse; Jason J Kutch; Evangelos A Theodorou
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2009

5.  Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults.

Authors:  Moritz M Daum; Susanne Huber; Horst Krist
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spinal circuits can accommodate interaction torques during multijoint limb movements.

Authors:  Thomas Buhrmann; Ezequiel A Di Paolo
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Biologically inspired modelling for the control of upper limb movements: from concept studies to future applications.

Authors:  Silvia Conforto; Ivan Bernabucci; Giacomo Severini; Maurizio Schmid; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  A compact representation of drawing movements with sequences of parabolic primitives.

Authors:  Felix Polyakov; Rotem Drori; Yoram Ben-Shaul; Moshe Abeles; Tamar Flash
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A biologically inspired neural network controller for ballistic arm movements.

Authors:  Ivan Bernabucci; Silvia Conforto; Marco Capozza; Neri Accornero; Maurizio Schmid; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Analysis of motor control strategy for frontal and sagittal planes of circular tracking movements using visual feedback noise from velocity change and depth information.

Authors:  Geonhui Lee; Woong Choi; Hanjin Jo; Wookhyun Park; Jaehyo Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.