Literature DB >> 9352481

Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopia from -1.25 to -6.00 diopters.

Z Wang1, J Chen, B Yang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of low to moderate amounts of myopia (-1.25 to -6.00 D).
METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) was performed on 432 eyes and LASIK on 137 eyes with a Chiron Keracor 116 excimer laser. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity, corneal sensitivity, contrast sensitivity, and corneal topography were examined before and after surgery.
RESULTS: One-year follow-up of 307 eyes in the PRK group and 103 eyes in the LASIK group was achieved. At 1 year, 83% (85 of 103) of LASIK eyes and 72% (221 of 307) of PRK eyes had an uncorrected visual acuity of 1.0 or better. Eighty-nine percent (92 of 103) of LASIK eyes and 83% (255 of 307) of PRK eyes had a refractive error within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia; 71% (73 of 103) of LASIK eyes and 61% (188 of 307) of PRK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. Contrast sensitivity and corneal sensitivity were reduced in both groups at the early postoperative stage but gradually returned to preoperative values; their recovery took about 3 months in LASIK eyes and 6 to 12 months in PRK eyes.
CONCLUSION: LASIK is safe and more predictable than PRK to correct low to moderate amounts of myopia. Recovery from LASIK is faster than after PRK.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9352481     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-19970901-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  14 in total

1.  The usefulness of Vistech and FACT contrast sensitivity charts for cataract and refractive surgery outcomes research.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; C A Hazel; R M L Doran; D B Elliott
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Studies of intrastromal corneal ring segments for the correction of low to moderate myopic refractive errors.

Authors:  D J Schanzlin
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

3.  Femtosecond laser corneal refractive surgery for the correction of high myopic anisometropic amblyopia in juveniles.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Ke-Ming Yu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 4.  Excimer laser refractive surgery.

Authors:  E E Manche; J D Carr; W W Haw; P S Hersh
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-07

5.  How accurate is an LCD screen version of the Pelli-Robson test?

Authors:  Fabrizio Zeri; Paolo Calcatelli; Eleonora Funaro; Marialuisa Martelli; Shehzad A Naroo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Corneal irregular astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.

Authors:  T M Baek; K H Lee; A Tomidokoro; T Oshika
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  The role of ultraviolet-B in corneal healing following excimer laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Jeannette Tóth; Attila Nagymihály; Ildikó Süveges
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Long term results of no-alcohol laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia.

Authors:  Leopoldo Spadea; Francesca Verboschi; Vittoria De Rosa; Mariella Salomone; Enzo Maria Vingolo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Changes in contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher order aberration by conventional myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Norishige Sakata; Tadatoshi Tokunaga; Kazunori Miyata; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  Intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis with two types of microkeratomes.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.