C R Smart1. 1. Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rapid escalation in the incidence of prostate carcinoma between the years 1988 and 1992 has been attributed to prostate specific antigen screening. There have been concerns regarding the possible diagnosis and treatment of insignificant tumors in the absence of randomized, controlled trial evidence of a decrease in mortality. Descriptive studies suggest that serial screening decreases the detection of advanced disease. In November 1996, the National Center for Health Statistics recorded a decrease in prostate carcinoma mortality. METHODS: The basis of this analysis is 208,234 prostate carcinoma cases diagnosed between 1973 and 1993 in population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. The general staging system was used rather than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer to permit observation of long term trends. Grade incorporating Gleason scores was used as an indication of the significance of the prostate carcinoma. Age-adjusted survival rates were used to separate prostate carcinoma deaths from deaths due to other causes. RESULTS: The increase in the incidence of prostate carcinoma has been greater than for any other malignancy. The increase was largely in Grade 2 significant tumors and not in Grade 1 (15%) insignificant tumors. There was a decrease in the detection of advanced disease. After the peak incidence in 1992, a progressive decrease to near baseline levels occurred. Approximately 38% of all deaths were from prostate carcinoma. Deaths from other causes increased with age. When corrected for death from other causes, men age > 69 years had a greater rate of death from prostate carcinoma than men age 50-69 years. Approximately 61% of all deaths from prostate carcinoma occurred within 5 years of diagnosis and 88% within 10 years. The 10-year survival rate for patients treated by radical prostatectomy was 100%, 78% for patients treated by radiation, and 33% for patients treated with other (noncomparable modalities). CONCLUSIONS: The indirect evidence suggested that prostate carcinoma screening of men ages >50 years decreased the incidence of distant disease, which influences the mortality rate.
BACKGROUND: The rapid escalation in the incidence of prostate carcinoma between the years 1988 and 1992 has been attributed to prostate specific antigen screening. There have been concerns regarding the possible diagnosis and treatment of insignificant tumors in the absence of randomized, controlled trial evidence of a decrease in mortality. Descriptive studies suggest that serial screening decreases the detection of advanced disease. In November 1996, the National Center for Health Statistics recorded a decrease in prostate carcinoma mortality. METHODS: The basis of this analysis is 208,234 prostate carcinoma cases diagnosed between 1973 and 1993 in population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. The general staging system was used rather than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer to permit observation of long term trends. Grade incorporating Gleason scores was used as an indication of the significance of the prostate carcinoma. Age-adjusted survival rates were used to separate prostate carcinoma deaths from deaths due to other causes. RESULTS: The increase in the incidence of prostate carcinoma has been greater than for any other malignancy. The increase was largely in Grade 2 significant tumors and not in Grade 1 (15%) insignificant tumors. There was a decrease in the detection of advanced disease. After the peak incidence in 1992, a progressive decrease to near baseline levels occurred. Approximately 38% of all deaths were from prostate carcinoma. Deaths from other causes increased with age. When corrected for death from other causes, men age > 69 years had a greater rate of death from prostate carcinoma than men age 50-69 years. Approximately 61% of all deaths from prostate carcinoma occurred within 5 years of diagnosis and 88% within 10 years. The 10-year survival rate for patients treated by radical prostatectomy was 100%, 78% for patients treated by radiation, and 33% for patients treated with other (noncomparable modalities). CONCLUSIONS: The indirect evidence suggested that prostate carcinoma screening of men ages >50 years decreased the incidence of distant disease, which influences the mortality rate.
Authors: S N Pentyala; J Lee; K Hsieh; W C Waltzer; A Trocchia; L Musacchia; M J Rebecchi; S A Khan Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Wolfgang Horninger; Andreas Berger; Alexandre Pelzer; Helmut Klocker; Wilhelm Oberaigner; Dieter Schönitzer; Gianluca Severi; Chris Robertson; Peter Boyle; Georg Bartsch Journal: Curr Urol Rep Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 2.862