Literature DB >> 9351554

Observations on the early detection of prostate cancer from the American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project.

C J Mettlin1, G P Murphy, R J Babaian, A Chesley, R A Kane, P J Littrup, F K Mostofi, P S Ray, W J Somers, A Toi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project (ACS-NPCDP) was established in 1987. The experience of the ACS-NPCDP demonstrates the yield and impact of periodic examinations for the early detection of prostate cancer.
METHODS: A cohort of 2999 well men ages 55-70 years was tested annually at 10 clinical centers by prostate specific antigen (PSA), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and digital rectal examination (DRE). Biopsies were performed on men with suspicious findings. Pathologic findings were reviewed. The initial study outcomes were the detection yield of multimodality testing and the comparative sensitivity and specificity of the different tests employed. Longer term outcomes included patient quality of life and survival.
RESULTS: The cancer detection rate declined significantly across the years of intervention. DRE had lower sensitivity than TRUS or PSA, particularly in later years of follow-up. The specificity of TRUS was lower than that of DRE. Fewer than 9% of the cancers detected in this study were clinically advanced at the time of diagnosis. Ninety-four percent of patients in whom cancer was detected are alive after an average follow-up of 54 months. In one case, death occurred after surgery. Two deaths were attributed to prostate cancer, and eleven other deaths were unrelated to prostate cancer or its treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Results of the ACS-NPCDP indicate that a combined-modality approach to prostate cancer detection yields high levels of early detection with infrequent adverse outcomes. Continued follow-up is required to evaluate long term morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9351554     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1814::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Community-based free prostate cancer screening program.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Matthew S Chang; Kayode Smith; Alexis Florio; Simon J Hall
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2007

2.  Quality of life among elderly men treated for prostate cancer with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shunichi Namiki; Shigeto Ishidoya; Sadafumu Kawamura; Tatsuo Tochigi; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Prostate cancers detected during 5α-reductase inhibitor use are smaller, de-differentiated, but confined when compared to controls.

Authors:  Fred Lee; Robert A Badalament; Chen Hu; Ingrid Bousho; Alex Tsodikov
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 4.  Developing DNA methylation-based diagnostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Hyerim Kim; Xudong Wang; Peng Jin
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 5.723

5.  Differences between men with screening-detected versus clinically diagnosed prostate cancers in the USA.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; S Noell Stone; David Espey; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Quality of life in a population of Polish patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Kutwin; Tomasz Konecki; Zbigniew Jabłonowski; Zbigniew Wolski; Marek Sosnowski
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-01-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.