Literature DB >> 9350588

The importance of pulsatile components of hypertension in predicting carotid stenosis in older adults.

S S Franklin1, K Sutton-Tyrrell, S H Belle, M A Weber, L H Kuller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pulsatile components of the blood pressure as risk markers for carotid stenosis in isolated systolic hypertension.
DESIGN: Duplex scans with Doppler measures of the blood flow velocity were used to diagnose carotid stenosis in 187 participants in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program and in 187 normotensive and mildly hypertensive control subjects.
METHODS: The systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were selected as independent variables. A logistic regression model for carotid stenosis was used to adjust for potentially confounding risk factors. Serial models, each containing single or double blood pressure variables, were run to compare risk markers for carotid stenosis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were compared to assess the predictive value of each model.
RESULTS: In the multivariate analysis, both the SBP (P = 0.005) and the pulse pressure (P < 0.001) were predictive of carotid stenosis, but the DBP and MAP were not. However, when either the SBP or the pulse pressure was included in the model, the DBP was associated negatively with carotid stenosis (P < 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively). An increased pulse pressure and a decreased DBP were independent risk markers for carotid stenosis. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the pulse pressure had superior predictive value to the SBP (P = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: The pulse pressure is the single best predictor of carotid stenosis. There is a negative correlation between the DBP and carotid stenosis for subjects with isolated systolic hypertension, but this can be demonstrated only after one has stratified for the SBP or for the pulse pressure. Thus, the pulsatile components of the blood pressure, increased pulse pressure and decreased DBP, are the most sensitive risk markers for the diagnoses of carotid stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9350588     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-199715100-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  27 in total

Review 1.  Is there a preferred antihypertensive therapy for isolated systolic hypertension and reduced arterial compliance?

Authors:  S S Franklin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Diastolic pressure, systolic pressure, or pulse pressure?

Authors:  C Vlachopoulos; M O'Rourke
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Isolated systolic hypertension, pulse pressure, and arterial stiffness as risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M F O'Rourke
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure versus pulse pressure.

Authors:  William B White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Comparison of usefulness of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and pulse pressure as predictors of cardiovascular death in patients >/=60 years of age (The Dubbo Study).

Authors:  Latha Palaniappan; Leon A Simons; Judith Simons; Yechiel Friedlander; John McCallum
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Gender, race, age, and regional differences in the association of pulse pressure with atrial fibrillation: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study.

Authors:  Lama Ghazi; Monika M Safford; Yulia Khodneva; Wesley T O'Neal; Elsayed Z Soliman; Stephen P Glasser
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2016-06-07

Review 7.  The effect of antihypertensive drugs on vascular compliance.

Authors:  N Winer; M A Weber; J R Sowers
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 8.  Trials in isolated systolic hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Bernard Waeber
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 9.  Trials in isolated systolic hypertension: an update.

Authors:  Bernard Waeber
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Retinal emboli and cardiovascular disease: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Ronald Klein; Barbara E K Klein; Scot E Moss; Stacy M Meuer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2003
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.