| Literature DB >> 9348287 |
G D Sterne1, G R Coulton, R A Brown, C J Green, G Terenghi.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of neurotrophin 3 (NT-3) enhanced nerve regeneration on the reinnervation of a target muscle. Muscle fibers can be classified according to their mechanical properties and myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform composition. MHC1 containing slow-type and MHC2a or 2b fast-type fibers are normally distributed in a mosaic pattern, their phenotype dictated by motor innervation. After denervation, all fibers switch to fast-type MHC2b expression and also undergo atrophy resulting in loss of muscle mass. After regeneration, discrimination between fast and slow fibers returns, but the distribution and fiber size change according to the level of reinnervation. In this study, rat gastrocnemius muscles (ipsilateral and contralateral to the side of nerve injury) were collected up to 8 mo after nerve repair, with or without local delivery of NT-3. The phenotype changes of MHC1, 2a, and 2b were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, and fiber type proportion, diameter, and grouping were assessed by computerized image analysis. At 8 mo, the local delivery of NT-3 resulted in significant improvement in gastrocnemius muscle weight compared with controls (NT-3 group 47%, controls 39% weight of contralateral normal muscle; P < 0.05). NT-3 delivery resulted in a significant increase in the proportion (NT-3 43.3%, controls 35.7%; P < 0.05) and diameter (NT-3 87.8 micron, controls 70.8 micron; P < 0.05) of fast type 2b fibers after reinnervation. This effect was specific to type 2b fibers; no normalization was seen in other fiber types. This study indicates that NT-3-enhanced axonal regeneration has a beneficial effect on the motor target organ. Also, NT-3 may be specifically affecting a subset of motoneurons that determine type 2b muscle fiber phenotype. As NT-3 was topically applied to cut nerves, our data suggest a discriminating effect of the neurotrophin on neuro-muscular interaction. These results would imply that muscle fibers may be differentially responsive to other neurotrophic factors and indicate the potential clinical role of NT-3 in the prevention of muscle atrophy after nerve injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1997 PMID: 9348287 PMCID: PMC2141699 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.139.3.709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Biol ISSN: 0021-9525 Impact factor: 10.539
Figure 1The percentage reduction in gastrocnemius muscle mass at various times after sciatic nerve division and repair. Each data point represents the mean of six animals. Error bars show the standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05 for NG vs. NT and FN, ANOVA. **P < 0.001 for NG vs. NT and FN, ANOVA. ***P < 0.05 for NT vs. FN, ANOVA. NG, autologous nerve graft repair; NT, repair with NT-3–impregnated fibronectin mats (500 ng/ml); FN, repair with plain fibronectin mats.
Figure 2(a) Transverse immunofluorescent sections of normal gastrocnemius muscle stained for MHC 2b, demonstrating the typical size and mosaic pattern of distribution. (b) 8 mo after repair of a 1-cm-long sciatic nerve defect using a plain fibronectin mat, the MHC 2b immunoreactive fibers are generally smaller, and there is a loss of the mosaic pattern of fiber type distribution. Bar, 50 μm.
The Mean Number of Fibers Counted in 10 Transects of the Whole Muscle in Each Group
| Normal | NG | NT | FN | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean fiber count ± SEM | 1,353 ± 66 | 1,347 ± 99 | 1,179 ± 42 | 1,185 ± 87 |
NG, autologous nerve graft repair; NT, repair with NT-3–impregnated fibronectin mats; FN, repair with plain fibronectin mats.
The Percentage Distribution of Fiber Types in Each Group (n = 6)
| Percentage ± SEM | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | NG | NT | FN | |||||
| MHC 1 | 21.4 ± 3.2 | 13.3 ± 1.9 | 12.3 ± 1.7 | 11.9 ± 1.5 | ||||
| MHC 2a | 15.8 ± 0.6 | 21.8 ± 1.7 | 25.9 ± 1.1 | 29.8 ± 1.7 | ||||
| MHC 2b | 44.3 ± 3.5 | 33.8 ± 0.9 | 43.3 ± 1.3* | 35.7 ± 1.1 | ||||
P < 0.05, NT vs. NG and FN (MHC 2b);
P < 0.02, normal vs. reinnverated muscle (MHC 1);
P < 0.01, normal vs. reinnervated muscles (MHC 2a and 2b). ANOVA, Dunns method. NG, autologous nerve graft repair; NT, repair with NT-3–impregnated fibronectin mats; FN, repair with plain fibronectin mats. In all experimental groups, there is a percentage of undefined fibers not represented in the table. These fibers are derived from the inability to label specific MHC IIx/d.
Diameters of the Different Fiber Types in Each Group
| Diameters | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | NG | NT | FN | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| MHC 1 | 67.8 | 65 | 54.7 | 58.4 | ||||
| (60.9–76.8) | (50.4–77.5) | (34.2–73.9) | (49.7–65.4) | |||||
| MHC 2a | 64.8 | 53.2 | 54.5 | 49.5 | ||||
| (52.9–75) | (45.8–59.8) | (47.6–63.9) | (43.7–57.6) | |||||
| MHC 2b | 86.7 | 81 | 87.8 | 70.8 | ||||
| (77.8–97.3) | (71.3–92.8) | (80.7–98.3) | (61.2–82.7) | |||||
Measurements are given in microns as the median values (25th–75th centiles) of each group (n = 6).
P < 0.01 for normal vs. reinnervated muscles, ANOVA on ranks, Dunns method. NG, autologous nerve graft repair; NT, repair with NT-3–impregnated fibronectin mats; FN, repair with plain fibronectin mats.
Figure 3(a) The size distribution of type I muscle fibers in each group. Note how after regeneration there is a general reduction in fiber diameter, with each of the reinnervated groups being significantly different from normal (P < 0.005; Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni adjustment). However, some muscle fibers in each group regain normal diameter. (b) Size distribution profiles of type IIa muscle fibers by group. There is a significant loss of large fibers in all groups but significantly fewer small diameter muscle fibers (P < 0.005; Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni adjustment). Overall, there is a tendency toward slightly smaller muscle fiber diameters in the reinnervated muscle compared with normal fibers. (c) Size distribution profiles of type IIb muscle fibers by group. The distribution profiles of the reinnervated NT group resembled the profile seen in normal muscle (P = 1 for NT vs. normal; Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni adjustment), but the profile for muscle fibers in the FN group was significantly different from both normal and the NT group (P < 0.005; Fisher's exact test, Bonferroni adjustment). Normal, normal gastrocnemius muscle; NG, autologous nerve graft repair; NT, repair with NT-3–impregnated fibronectin mats (500 ng/ml); FN, repair with plain fibronectin mats.