Literature DB >> 9347428

Remifentanil versus alfentanil in a balanced anesthetic technique for total abdominal hysterectomy.

A L Kovac1, S S Azad, P Steer, T Witkowski, R Batenhorst, S McNeal.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To compare the intraoperative effects and recovery characteristics of remifentanil hydrochloride and alfentanil when administered as part of balanced anesthesia, and to assess the effects of an additional remifentanil infusion administered as analgesic pretreatment before removal of the uterus.
DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study.
SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: 35 ASA physical status I, II, and III women scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy with general endotracheal anesthesia.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.). Anesthesia was induced with thiopental 2 mg/kg, vecuronium 0.15 mg/kg, and a single dose of opioid over 60 seconds (Pump 1): remifentanil 2 micrograms/kg (Remi/Placebo and Remi/Remi groups) or alfentanil 50 micrograms/kg (Alf/Placebo group). Anesthesia was maintained with a nitrous oxide/oxygen mixture (66:34 ratio) and a continuous opioid infusion: remifentanil 0.25 microgram/kg/min (Remi/Placebo and Remi/Remi) or alfentanil 0.5 microgram/kg/min (Alf/Placebo). At skin incision, a second blinded drug infusion was also initiated (Pump 2): remifentanil 0.25 microgram/kg/min (Remi/Remi) or saline placebo (Remi/Placebo and Alf/Placebo). Intraoperative responses were controlled with single doses of opioid and/or rate titrations via Pump 1. Pump 2 was terminated on removal of the uterus. Pump 1 was terminated at skin closure.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean (+/- SD) opioid infusion rates administered for the duration of Pump 2 to suppress responses to removal of the uterus were 0.49 +/- 0.27 microgram/kg/min, 1.99 +/- 1.34 micrograms/kg/min, and 0.49 +/- 0.07 microgram/kg/min for the Remi/Placebo, Alf/Placebo, and Remi/Remi groups, respectively. At these rates, similar proportions of patients in the Remi/Placebo (67%) and the Alf/Placebo (60%) groups had responses. Fewer patients had responses in the Remi/Remi group (8%) compared with the Remi/Placebo and Alf/Placebo groups (p < 0.05). The mean total opioid doses used during maintenance were 84.6 micrograms/kg (Remi/Placebo), 393 micrograms/kg (Alf/Placebo), and 68.7 micrograms/kg (Remi/Remi). Awakening times were significantly shorter (p < 0.05) in the remifentanil population compared with the alfentanil population, but discharge times were similar. More patients received naloxone to reverse opioid effects in the alfentanil population (60%) than in the remifentanil population (20%) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A mean remifentanil infusion of 0.49 microgram/kg/min is as effective as a mean alfentanil infusion of 1.99 micrograms/kg/min in suppressing intraoperative responses. Doubling of the remifentanil infusion to 0.5 microgram/kg/min before the major stress event improves suppression of responses and lowers intraoperative use of remifentanil without prolonging recovery times. Remifentanil allows faster awakening times than alfentanil, but preemptive administration of postoperative analgesics is recommended to facilitate discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9347428     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  6 in total

Review 1.  The clinical pharmacology of remifentanil: a brief review.

Authors:  Talmage D Egan
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Continuous infusion of two doses of remifentanil immediately after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jae Jun Lee; Sung Mi Hwang; Jun Sung Lee; Sung Jun Hong; Soo Kyung Lee; So Young Lim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.

Authors:  Demet Coskun; Hulya Celebi; Gozde Karaca; Lale Karabiyik
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  [Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Results of a multicenter study of 6,161 patients].

Authors:  J Schmidt; W Hering; S Albrecht
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [Remifentanil-based intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative pain therapy. Is there an optimal treatment strategy?].

Authors:  C Zöllner; M Schäfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Comparison of intraoperative blood loss during spinal surgery using either remifentanil or fentanyl as an adjuvant to general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hiroaki Kawano; Sawa Manabe; Tomomi Matsumoto; Eisuke Hamaguchi; Michiko Kinoshita; Fumihiko Tada; Shuzo Oshita
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.