OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of dopexamine with dopamine in the treatment of low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study conducted in intensive care units at centres in Holland and Belgium. Patients were randomised to receive dopexamine (up to 2.0 micrograms/ kg per min) or dopamine (up to 6.0 micrograms/kg per min) for 6 h after low cardiac output syndrome was confirmed. RESULTS:70 patients were enrolled (35/group) and there was no significant differences in the operative procedures or haemodynamics at entry into the study. Clinical efficacy, defined as a cardiac index > 2.5 l/min per m2 with urine production > 0.5 ml/kg per h and stable haemodynamics for two consecutive readings 1 h apart, was achieved by 90 and 87% of patients in the dopexamine and dopamine groups, respectively. However, more patients maintained clinical efficacy over the 6-h period in the dopexamine group, which was statistically significant at 1-2 h and approached significance at all other time points. Safety was assessed by comparing the adverse events and concomitant medication. Fewer patients on dopexamine had cardiac events compared with dopamine-treated patients (25 vs 38 events), although there was no difference in the pattern of rhythm disturbance. Fewer patients in the dopexamine group required concomitant vasodilating drugs (18 vs 30). CONCLUSION: Taking the proportion of patients achieving clinical efficacy, the time to achieve it and the maintenance of it along with the adverse event profile, dopexamine was shown to be an effective and safe drug to use in the management of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and may be superior to dopamine.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of dopexamine with dopamine in the treatment of low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study conducted in intensive care units at centres in Holland and Belgium. Patients were randomised to receive dopexamine (up to 2.0 micrograms/ kg per min) or dopamine (up to 6.0 micrograms/kg per min) for 6 h after low cardiac output syndrome was confirmed. RESULTS: 70 patients were enrolled (35/group) and there was no significant differences in the operative procedures or haemodynamics at entry into the study. Clinical efficacy, defined as a cardiac index > 2.5 l/min per m2 with urine production > 0.5 ml/kg per h and stable haemodynamics for two consecutive readings 1 h apart, was achieved by 90 and 87% of patients in the dopexamine and dopamine groups, respectively. However, more patients maintained clinical efficacy over the 6-h period in the dopexamine group, which was statistically significant at 1-2 h and approached significance at all other time points. Safety was assessed by comparing the adverse events and concomitant medication. Fewer patients on dopexamine had cardiac events compared with dopamine-treated patients (25 vs 38 events), although there was no difference in the pattern of rhythm disturbance. Fewer patients in the dopexamine group required concomitant vasodilating drugs (18 vs 30). CONCLUSION: Taking the proportion of patients achieving clinical efficacy, the time to achieve it and the maintenance of it along with the adverse event profile, dopexamine was shown to be an effective and safe drug to use in the management of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and may be superior to dopamine.
Authors: Alexandre Mebazaa; Antonis A Pitsis; Alain Rudiger; Wolfgang Toller; Dan Longrois; Sven-Erik Ricksten; Ilona Bobek; Stefan De Hert; Georg Wieselthaler; Uwe Schirmer; Ludwig K von Segesser; Michael Sander; Don Poldermans; Marco Ranucci; Peter C J Karpati; Patrick Wouters; Manfred Seeberger; Edith R Schmid; Walter Weder; Ferenc Follath Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Julia Schumann; Eva C Henrich; Hellen Strobl; Roland Prondzinsky; Sophie Weiche; Holger Thiele; Karl Werdan; Stefan Frantz; Susanne Unverzagt Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-01-29
Authors: Thomas Schilling; Matthias Gründling; Christof M Strang; Klaus-Uwe Möritz; Werner Siegmund; Thomas Hachenberg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-05-11 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Marc Leone; Benoit Vallet; Jean-Louis Teboul; Joachim Mateo; Olivier Bastien; Claude Martin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Bart Hiemstra; Geert Koster; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen; Thomas W L Scheeren; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Konstantin Uhlig; Ljupcho Efremov; Jörn Tongers; Stefan Frantz; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Daniel Sedding; Julia Schumann Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-11-05