OBJECTIVE: To reduce variability in primary care physicians' use of procedures for imaging the lumbar spine. DESIGN: Controlled intervention using clinical practice guideline and practice pattern feedback. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-seven internists and 28 family practitioners in a large, group-model HMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intervention group physicians received the clinical practice guideline for low back pain, followed after 4 months by three bimonthly feedback reports on their current use rates for lumber spine x-rays and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the lumbar spine. Control group physicians received neither the guideline nor the feedback reports. Automated radiology utilization data were used to compare intervention and control group physicians' changes in use rates and variability in use rates over the course of the study period. Neither the guideline alone nor the guideline plus feedback was associated with a significant decrease in use rates or in the variability in use rates for the lumbar spine imaging procedures under study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines and practice pattern feedback fail to achieve their goals when features of the practice setting and patient expectations and behavior are not identified and addressed.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To reduce variability in primary care physicians' use of procedures for imaging the lumbar spine. DESIGN: Controlled intervention using clinical practice guideline and practice pattern feedback. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-seven internists and 28 family practitioners in a large, group-model HMO. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intervention group physicians received the clinical practice guideline for low back pain, followed after 4 months by three bimonthly feedback reports on their current use rates for lumber spine x-rays and computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans of the lumbar spine. Control group physicians received neither the guideline nor the feedback reports. Automated radiology utilization data were used to compare intervention and control group physicians' changes in use rates and variability in use rates over the course of the study period. Neither the guideline alone nor the guideline plus feedback was associated with a significant decrease in use rates or in the variability in use rates for the lumbar spine imaging procedures under study. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical practice guidelines and practice pattern feedback fail to achieve their goals when features of the practice setting and patient expectations and behavior are not identified and addressed.
Authors: Hazel J Jenkins; Mark J Hancock; Simon D French; Chris G Maher; Roger M Engel; John S Magnussen Journal: CMAJ Date: 2015-03-02 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Ana Paula Ribeiro Bonilauri Ferreira; Rodrigo Fernando Ferreira; Dimple Rajgor; Jatin Shah; Andrea Menezes; Ricardo Pietrobon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: James W Mold; Chester Fox; Angela Wisniewski; Paula Darby Lipman; Margot R Krauss; D Robert Harris; Cheryl Aspy; Rachel A Cohen; Kurt Elward; Paul Frame; Barbara P Yawn; Leif I Solberg; René Gonin Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Elke Jeschke; Thomas Ostermann; Horst C Vollmar; Matthias Kröz; Angelina Bockelbrink; Claudia M Witt; Stefan N Willich; Harald Matthes Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 2.497