Literature DB >> 9346142

Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion.

C L Schnee1, A Freese, R J Weil, P J Marcotte.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of 184 autologous iliac crest bone grafts used for anterior cervical fusion in 144 procedures.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest site on operation and recovery and to identify patients at risk for harvest morbidity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although autologous iliac crest bone graft is considered the most successful grafting material, concerns about harvest morbidity provide a rationale for considering allograft. Data about the use of autograft therefore would assist spinal surgeons in selecting the appropriate substrates for fusion after anterior cervical decompression.
METHODS: Statistical analysis based on patient gender, smoking history, obesity, and medical or pharmacologic risk factors for wound healing was used to evaluate morbidity after patient interviews and examinations. Limited assessment of radiographic outcome also was performed.
RESULTS: A second operation because of donor site morbidity was performed in four patients (2.8%), but only one (0.7%) with meralgia paresthetica had permanent sequelae. Superficial wound infection or dehiscence occurred in 5.6% of patients, with a disproportionate number of women, obese patients, and those with medical risk represented. Protracted wound symptoms of pain and poor cosmesis were reported in 2.8% and 3.5% of patients, respectively, and also were found in a significant number of female and obese patients. Evidence of fusion was present in 97% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Autologous iliac crest bone graft harvest results in minimal major morbidity when regional anatomy is respected and careful technique is observed. The identification of patients at risk for minor complications suggests that allograft may be appropriate in these patients; however, prospective comparison is required to identify whether graft material or technical factors determine fusion success and relative benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9346142     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710010-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  58 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Solvent-preserved, bovine cancellous bone blocks used for reconstruction of thoracolumbar fractures in minimally invasive spinal surgery-first clinical results.

Authors:  Markus Schultheiss; Michael Sarkar; Markus Arand; Michael Kramer; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lothar Kinzl; Erich Hartwig
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A new source of structural autograft for ACDF surgery: cervical laminae.

Authors:  Jiaming Liu; Xu Xiong; Xinhua Long; Yong Shu; Shanhu Huang; Dong Yang; Zhili Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

Review 4.  [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

7.  Comparison of the biomechanical stability of dense cancellous allograft with tricortical iliac autograft and fibular allograft for cervical interbody fusion.

Authors:  Stephen I Ryu; Jesse T Lim; Sung-Min Kim; Josemaria Paterno; Rafer Willenberg; Daniel H Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [An improved vertebral body replacement for the thoracolumbar spine. A biomechanical in vitro test on human lumbar vertebral bodies].

Authors:  M Reinhold; W Schmölz; F Canto; D Krappinger; M Blauth; C Knop
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques.

Authors:  Raymond Pollock; Ilhan Alcelik; Chandra Bhatia; Graham Chuter; Kiran Lingutla; Chakravarty Budithi; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Iliac crest reconstruction with a bioactive ceramic spacer.

Authors:  Manabu Ito; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Hiroshi Moridaira; Yasuhiro Shono; Yoshihisa Kotani; Akio Minami; Kiyoshi Kaneda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.