Literature DB >> 9345492

Is multivariate analysis of PET data more revealing than the univariate approach? Evidence from a study of episodic memory retrieval.

P C Fletcher1, R J Dolan, T Shallice, C D Frith, R S Frackowiak, K J Friston.   

Abstract

In a functional imaging study of cued paired associate retrieval, in which the strength of association between pair members was systematically varied, we predicted increased right frontal activity as a function of weakening semantic linkage. An initial univariate analysis found the opposite effect, with greater right frontal activity during recall of strongly linked paired associates. This unexpected result led us to perform a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA), an approach which proved more informative. This analysis showed that the most significant source of task-related variance was accounted for by a nonlinear relationship not predicted by the prior hypothesis and not revealed by the standard univariate approach. This application of the MANCOVA supports the assertion that multivariate analysis can provide an important adjunct to univariate approaches like statistical parametric mapping (SPM). New perspectives engendered by the MANCOVA still allow for statistical inference but are not constrained by explicit hypotheses about specific task-dependent effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9345492     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive neuroscience from a behavioral perspective: A critique of chasing ghosts with geiger counters.

Authors:  Steven F Faux
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2002

2.  The default network and processing of personally relevant information: converging evidence from task-related modulations and functional connectivity.

Authors:  Omer Grigg; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Routes to the past: neural substrates of direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Katie Knapp; Reece P Roberts; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  How does spatial extent of fMRI datasets affect independent component analysis decomposition?

Authors:  Adriana Aragri; Tommaso Scarabino; Erich Seifritz; Silvia Comani; Sossio Cirillo; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Fabrizio Esposito; Francesco Di Salle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: implications for distractibility.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Cheryl L Grady; Charisa Ng; Lynn Hasher
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Multivariate models of inter-subject anatomical variability.

Authors:  John Ashburner; Stefan Klöppel
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Age differences in the intrinsic functional connectivity of default network subsystems.

Authors:  Karen L Campbell; Omer Grigg; Cristina Saverino; Nathan Churchill; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.750

8.  Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data.

Authors:  Cheryl L Grady; Jenny R Rieck; Daniel Nichol; Karen M Rodrigue; Kristen M Kennedy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.