BACKGROUND: Early in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection there is a decline in viral replication that has been attributed to host immunity, but the components of this response, particularly the ability of cytotoxic T lymphocytes to control viral burden and influence the outcome of disease, are poorly understood. METHODS: We prospectively studied 33 patients with primary HIV-1 infection for HIV-specific activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes and memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes and compared these lymphocyte responses with changes in viral load and clinical status over the subsequent 18 to 24 months. RESULTS: Soon after infection, activated HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, mediated primarily by CD8+ cells, were detected in 17 of 23 patients (74 percent). Memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes were found in 6 of 6 patients tested (100 percent) during the first three months of infection and in 17 of 21 patients (81 percent) tested during the first six months. The frequencies of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes varied markedly over time, but overall they declined over the first 6 to 8 months and then stabilized over the next 12 to 18 months. The patients with higher frequencies of Env-specific memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes had a median level of plasma HIV-1 RNA about one third that of the patients with lower frequencies, (median number of RNA copies per milliliter, 22,000 vs. 62,000; P=0.006). Patients with low frequencies of Env-specific memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (or none) in early infection had a more rapid decline to less than 300 CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In early HIV-1 infection, the induction of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes, particularly those specific for Env, helps control viral replication and is associated with slower declines in CD4+ cell counts. Host cytolytic effector responses appear to delay the progression of HIV-1 disease.
BACKGROUND: Early in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection there is a decline in viral replication that has been attributed to host immunity, but the components of this response, particularly the ability of cytotoxic T lymphocytes to control viral burden and influence the outcome of disease, are poorly understood. METHODS: We prospectively studied 33 patients with primary HIV-1 infection for HIV-specific activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes and memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes and compared these lymphocyte responses with changes in viral load and clinical status over the subsequent 18 to 24 months. RESULTS: Soon after infection, activated HIV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, mediated primarily by CD8+ cells, were detected in 17 of 23 patients (74 percent). Memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes were found in 6 of 6 patients tested (100 percent) during the first three months of infection and in 17 of 21 patients (81 percent) tested during the first six months. The frequencies of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes varied markedly over time, but overall they declined over the first 6 to 8 months and then stabilized over the next 12 to 18 months. The patients with higher frequencies of Env-specific memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes had a median level of plasma HIV-1 RNA about one third that of the patients with lower frequencies, (median number of RNA copies per milliliter, 22,000 vs. 62,000; P=0.006). Patients with low frequencies of Env-specific memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes (or none) in early infection had a more rapid decline to less than 300 CD4+ cells per cubic millimeter (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In early HIV-1 infection, the induction of memory cytotoxic T lymphocytes, particularly those specific for Env, helps control viral replication and is associated with slower declines in CD4+ cell counts. Host cytolytic effector responses appear to delay the progression of HIV-1 disease.
Authors: M Dalod; M Dupuis; J C Deschemin; C Goujard; C Deveau; L Meyer; N Ngo; C Rouzioux; J G Guillet; J F Delfraissy; M Sinet; A Venet Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: S J Brodie; B K Patterson; D A Lewinsohn; K Diem; D Spach; P D Greenberg; S R Riddell; L Corey Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: R Kamin-Lewis; S F Abdelwahab; C Trang; A Baker; A L DeVico; R C Gallo; G K Lewis Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-07-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bimal K Chakrabarti; Wing-pui Kong; Bei-yue Wu; Zhi-Yong Yang; Jacques Friborg; Xu Ling; Steven R King; David C Montefiori; Gary J Nabel Journal: J Virol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Sampa Santra; Dan H Barouch; Marcelo J Kuroda; Jörn E Schmitz; Georgia R Krivulka; Kristin Beaudry; Carol I Lord; Michelle A Lifton; Linda S Wyatt; Bernard Moss; Vanessa M Hirsch; Norman L Letvin Journal: J Virol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: A Giovannetti; M Pierdominici; F Mazzetta; S Salemi; M Marziali; D Kuonen; F Iebba; E A Lusi; A Cossarizza; F Aiuti Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 4.330